Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15747038›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Kardiologie2005

Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS)-registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).

R Zahn, E Roth, T Ischinger, B Mark, M Hochadel, U Zeymer, K Haerten, K E Hauptmann, E-R von Leitner, A Schramm and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Position paper on the indication for and implementation of interventional treatment of extracranial carotid stenosis].Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2006
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The role of endovascular expertise in carotid artery stenting: results from the ALKK-CAS-Registry in 5,535 patients.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Carotid intervention 3: the evidence for cerebral protection.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

R ZahnHerzzentrum Ludwigshafen, Kardiologie, Bremserstrasse 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany. erzahn@aol.com
E Roth
T Ischinger
B Mark
M Hochadel
U Zeymer
K Haerten
K E Hauptmann
E-R von Leitner
A Schramm
W Kasper
J Senges
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEJanssen (Germany) · DEKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier · DEMarienhospital Osnabrück · DEMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DEStadtarchiv Worms · DESt. Josef Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid artery stenting (CAS) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis seems to be on the doorstep of more widespread use. However, its feasibility and safety in clinical practice at a broad spectrum of hospitals needs to be determined.

methodsWe analyzed data of the prospective multi-centre Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) Registry of the German Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK).

resultsFrom 7/1996 to 5/2004 1888 patients from 28 hospitals were included in the CAS Registry. The median hospital stay from CAS until hospital discharge was 3 days (quartiles: 2-6 days). Median patients age was 70 years (quartiles: 64-76 years) with 72.1% males. CAS for symptomatic stenosis was performed in 55% of cases. Patients treated with CAS suffered from coronary artery disease in 66.5%, had arterial hypertension in 91.7%, hyperlipidemia in 86.3% and 34.2% were diabetics. The intended CAS procedure was completed in 98.1% of cases. A stent was implanted in 97.3% of completed cases. The median intervention time was 43 min (quartiles: 30-60 min). During the hospital stay death rate was 0.3% (5/1888) and the rate of ipsilateral stroke 3.2% (58/1840). A contralateral ischemic event occurred in 1.4% (26/ 1840) of patients. The combined rate of all death or strokes was 3.8% (70/1841). Between 1996 and 2004 there was a steady increase in the use of protection devices during CAS (0% in 1996 and 97.9% in 2004; p for trend <0.0001). There was also an increase in the proportion of patients treated for asymptomatic stenoses (p for trend <0.0001). We observed a decrease of the combined endpoint of death or stroke from 6.3% in 1996 to 1.9% in 2004 (p for trend=0.021).

conclusionThe multi-centre ALKK CAS Registry data confirm the feasibility and shot-term safety of CAS even in daily clinical practice. There was a rapid penetration of the use of embolic protection devices, an increase in treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenoses and a decrease in acute complication rates from 1996 to 2004.

Indexed as

Societies, MedicalAgedCarotid StenosisCause of DeathComorbidityEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleGermanyHospital MortalityHumansIntracranial EmbolismLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID15747038
OpenAlexW2468629676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.