Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15746316›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005

Toxin-producing ability among Bacillus spp. outside the Bacillus cereus group.

Cecilie From, Rudiger Pukall, Peter Schumann, Víctor Hormazábal, Per Einar Granum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preclinical Safety Assessment ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Case Report:The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  10. Antibacterial Silver Nanomaterial Synthesis FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Safety assesment ofToxicology reports · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bacillus cereus food poisoning: international and Indian perspective.Journal of food science and technology · 2015
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilie FromDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, PO Box 8146, Dep, NO-0033 Oslo, Norway.
Rudiger Pukall
Peter Schumann
Víctor Hormazábal
Per Einar Granum
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NOLeibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 333 Bacillus spp. isolated from foods, water, and food plants were examined for the production of possible enterotoxins and emetic toxins using a cytotoxicity assay on Vero cells, the boar spermatozoa motility assay, and a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Eight strains produced detectable toxins; six strains were cytotoxic, three strains produced putative emetic toxins (different in size from cereulide), and one strain produced both cytotoxin(s) and putative emetic toxin(s). The toxin-producing strains could be assigned to four different species, B. subtilis, B. mojavensis, B. pumilus, or B. fusiformis, by using a polyphasic approach including biochemical, chemotaxonomic, and DNA-based analyses. Four of the strains produced cytotoxins that were concentrated by ammonium sulfate followed by dialysis, and two strains produced cytotoxins that were not concentrated by such a treatment. Two cultures maintained full cytotoxic activity, two cultures reduced their activity, and two cultures lost their activity after boiling. The two most cytotoxic strains (both B. mojavensis) were tested for toxin production at different temperatures. One of these strains produced cytotoxin at growth temperatures ranging from 25 to 42 degrees C, and no reduction in activity was observed even after 24 h of growth at 42 degrees C. The strains that produced putative emetic toxins were tested for the influence of time and temperature on the toxin production. It was shown that they produced putative emetic toxin faster or just as fast at 30 as at 22 degrees C. None of the cytotoxic strains produced B. cereus-like enterotoxins as tested by PCR or by immunological methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacillusBacterial ToxinsBase SequenceChlorocebus aethiopsDNA, BacterialDNA GyraseEnterotoxinsGenes, BacterialMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionShiga ToxinsVero CellsBacterial ToxinsDNA, BacterialDNA GyraseEnterotoxinsShiga Toxins

Identifiers

PMID15746316
PMCPMC1065142
OpenAlexW2117350727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.