ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2005
ACE inhibition in stable coronary artery disease.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of crossover on mortality in a randomized study of revascularization in patients with systolic heart failure and coronary artery disease.Circulation. Heart failure · 2013Trial
- The impact of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers on 3-year clinical outcomes in elderly (≥ 65) patients with acute myocardial infarction without hypertension.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- Article
- Renin-angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes in stable coronary artery disease without heart failure.European heart journal · 2014Article
- Immunological aspects of atherosclerosis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2014Review
- [Secondary prevention after myocardial infarction].Der Internist · 2008Review
- ACE inhibition in secondary prevention: are the results controversial?Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15745989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.