Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15744591›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2005

A phase I study of oral ZD 1839 given daily in patients with solid tumors: IND.122, a study of the Investigational New Drug Program of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

G Goss, H Hirte, W H Miller, I A J Lorimer, D Stewart, G Batist, D A E Parolin, P Hanna, S Stafford, J Friedmann and 4 more

Abstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of urachal cancer: A consensus statement by the Canadian Urological Association and Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacodynamics: biological activity of targeted therapies in clinical trials.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

G GossOttawa Regional Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 1C4, Canada. glenwood.goss@orcc.on.ca
H Hirte
W H Miller
I A J Lorimer
D Stewart
G Batist
D A E Parolin
P Hanna
S Stafford
J Friedmann
W Walsh
S Mathews
L Douglas
L K Seymour

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), the biological active (BA) dose and the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 (Iressa) when administered continuously as a once daily dose in patients with advanced, incurable solid tumours. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled in cohorts of three from three National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) centers. ZD1839 was given at doses from 150 to 800 mg daily orally and patients underwent a pretreatment and a 28 day post treatment tumor biopsy, while PK sampling was performed on days 8, 15, 22, 29, and a toxicity assessment every 28 days.

resultsAll twenty-eight patients were evaluable for non-hematological and hematological toxicity. Twenty-seven were evaluable for response. The MTD was not reached but DLT included reversible rash and diarrhea. One patient with urachal cancer had a transient 55% decrease in tumor size and two other patients (breast and non-small cell lung cancer) had minor responses; three additional patients had pharmacodynamic evidence of target effect. PK demonstrated steady state within the first 2 weeks of dosing and dose dependent exposure.

conclusionIt appears that ZD 1839 at a dose of 800 m/day was tolerable, although some patients required dose modification for diarrhea. Doses above 250 m/day demonstrate biologic activity and could be consider for future study in a variety of EGFR positive tumor types.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveCanadaErbB ReceptorsFemaleGefitinibHalf-LifeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolinesAntineoplastic AgentsErbB ReceptorsGefitinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsQuinazolines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.