Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15743807›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2005

High-resolution genome-wide mapping of transposon integration in mammals.

Stephen R Yant, Xiaolin Wu, Yong Huang, Brian Garrison, Shawn M Burgess, Mark A Kay

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 163 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 322 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Auto-expansion ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  5. Engineering of potent CAR NK cells using non-viral Sleeping Beauty transposition from minimalistic DNA vectors.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Enhanced Biosafety of theBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Nonviral genome engineering of natural killer cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen R YantStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, 300 Pasteur Dr., Room G-305, Stanford, CA 94305-5208, USA.
Xiaolin Wu
Yong Huang
Brian Garrison
Shawn M Burgess
Mark A Kay
Pediatrics and Genetics · USStanford University · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

Zebrafish targeted mutagenesis and functional genomicsZIAHG000183 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BURGESS, SHAWN M · 2009 to 2025
$16.7M
Transposon based gene therapeuticsP01AR044012 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARINKOVICH, MATT PETER · 1997 to 2006
$10.2M
Insertional mutagenesis and ear developmentZ01HG000183 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BURGESS, SHAWN M · 2001 to 2008
$3.3M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR44012NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR044012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon is an emerging tool for transgenesis, gene discovery, and therapeutic gene delivery in mammals. Here we studied 1,336 SB insertions in primary and cultured mammalian cells in order to better understand its target site preferences. We report that, although widely distributed, SB integration recurrently targets certain genomic regions and shows a small but significant bias toward genes and their upstream regulatory sequences. Compared to those of most integrating viruses, however, the regional preferences associated with SB-mediated integration were much less pronounced and were not significantly influenced by transcriptional activity. Insertions were also distinctly nonrandom with respect to intergenic sequences, including a strong bias toward microsatellite repeats, which are predominantly enriched in noncoding DNA. Although we detected a consensus sequence consistent with a twofold dyad symmetry at the target site, the most widely used sites did not match this consensus. In conjunction with an observed SB integration preference for bent DNA, these results suggest that physical properties may be the major determining factor in SB target site selection. These findings provide basic insights into the transposition process and reveal important distinctions between transposon- and virus-based integrating vectors.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsCells, CulturedChromosome MappingConsensus SequenceDNA Transposable ElementsHumansMiceMutagenesis, InsertionalRecombination, GeneticTerminal Repeat SequencesVirus IntegrationDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID15743807
PMCPMC1061620
OpenAlexW1970491071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.