Trial reportHNO2006
[Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in inpatient voice rehabilitation medicine].
Trial report in HNO, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translated Versions of Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-30 across Languages: A Systematic Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2015Review
- Correlation between coping strategies and subjective assessment of the voice-related quality of life of patients after resection of T1 and T2 laryngeal tumours.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2012Article
- Article
- [Grading of the Voice Handicap Index].HNO · 2008Article
- [Complaints of patients with dysphonia].HNO · 2008Article
- Voice in early glottic cancer compared to benign voice pathology.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe focus of this study was to determine if the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is a valid tool for evaluating an inpatient voice rehabilitation program. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 39 German-speaking patients were asked to complete a German version of the VHI questionnaire at the beginning and 3 months after attending a voice rehabilitation program on an inpatient basis at the Bad Gögging voice center. The data collected were documented and assessed using Microsoft Excel and MATLAB.
resultsA significant reduction of the VHI summary score was achieved by 10 of 39 patients. An increased number of voice therapy sessions before the program diminished (!) the VHI score 3 months after the program. Work disability because of the dysphonia before the beginning of the voice rehabilitation program showed no significant correlation with the VHI score.
conclusionsAt present, the VHI cannot be regarded as a reliable measure to evaluate benefit derived from completing a voice rehabilitation program on an inpatient basis. Apparently, numerous prior treatment regimens constitute a negative prognostic criterion for rehabilitation success as measured subjectively by the VHI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.