Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15741435›Full record

ArticleThorax2005

Involvement in treatment decisions: what do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey.

A-L Caress, K Beaver, K Luker, M Campbell, A Woodcock

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Shared decision-making for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care: a qualitative longitudinal observational and interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A-L CaressSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. ann.caress@manchester.ac.uk
K Beaver
K Luker
M Campbell
A Woodcock
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent healthcare policy advocates patient participation in treatment decision making. However, in asthma there is little evidence regarding patients' views on such involvement. This study explored the preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decisions, rationales for role preference, perceived facilitators of/barriers to involvement, and the interrelationship of role preference and demographic variables in a sample of patients with asthma.

methodsA cross sectional survey was performed of 230 adults with clinician diagnosed asthma from 10 primary care sites and one specialist respiratory centre in north-west England. Preferred role in treatment decisions was assessed using the Control Preferences Scale.

resultsFifty five (23.9%) preferred an active role, 82 (35.7%) a collaborative role, and 93 (40.4%) a passive role; 19 (8.2%) perceived their role as active compared with 45 (19.6%) collaborative and 166 (72.2%) passive. Only 33.5% (n = 77) of respondents attained their most preferred role; 55.2% (n = 127) were less involved than they preferred. Patient related, professional related, and organisational factors, especially quality and duration of consultations, facilitated or hampered involvement. Role preferences were not strongly associated with demographic variables or asthma severity.

conclusionsThis study in patients with asthma highlights the fact that there is a need for professional and patient education regarding partnership working, skilful communication, and innovative approaches to service delivery.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerception

Identifiers

PMID15741435
PMCPMC1747348
OpenAlexW2109565577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.