Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15740633›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2005

Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous dendritic cell (DC) derived-exosomes: results of thefirst phase I clinical trial.

Bernard Escudier, Thierry Dorval, Nathalie Chaput, Fabrice André, Marie-Pierre Caby, Sophie Novault, Caroline Flament, Christophe Leboulaire, Christophe Borg, Sebastian Amigorena and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 720 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
720citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

720 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Extracellular Vesicles and Their Role in Osteogenesis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

660 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bernard EscudierDepartment of Immunotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. zitvogel@igr.fr.
Thierry Dorval
Nathalie Chaput
Fabrice André
Marie-Pierre Caby
Sophie Novault
Caroline Flament
Christophe Leboulaire
Christophe Borg
Sebastian Amigorena
Catherine Boccaccio
Christian Bonnerot
Olivier Dhellin
Mojgan Movassagh
Sophie Piperno
Caroline Robert
Vincent Serra
Nancy Valente
Jean-Bernard Le Pecq
Alain Spatz
Olivier Lantz
Thomas Tursz
Eric Angevin
Laurence Zitvogel
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Curie · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDC derived-exosomes are nanomeric vesicles harboring functional MHC/peptide complexes capable of promoting T cell immune responses and tumor rejection. Here we report the feasability and safety of the first Phase I clinical trial using autologous exosomes pulsed with MAGE 3 peptides for the immunization of stage III/IV melanoma patients. Secondary endpoints were the monitoring of T cell responses and the clinical outcome. PATIENTS AND

methodsExosomes were purified from day 7 autologous monocyte derived-DC cultures. Fifteen patients fullfilling the inclusion criteria (stage IIIB and IV, HLA-A1+, or -B35+ and HLA-DPO4+ leukocyte phenotype, tumor expressing MAGE3 antigen) were enrolled from 2000 to 2002 and received four exosome vaccinations. Two dose levels of either MHC class II molecules (0.13 versus 0.40 x 1014 molecules) or peptides (10 versus 100 mug/ml) were tested. Evaluations were performed before and 2 weeks after immunization. A continuation treatment was performed in 4 cases of non progression.

resultsThe GMP process allowed to harvest about 5 x 1014 exosomal MHC class II molecules allowing inclusion of all 15 patients. There was no grade II toxicity and the maximal tolerated dose was not achieved. One patient exhibited a partial response according to the RECIST criteria. This HLA-B35+/A2+ patient vaccinated with A1/B35 defined CTL epitopes developed halo of depigmentation around naevi, a MART1-specific HLA-A2 restricted T cell response in the tumor bed associated with progressive loss of HLA-A2 and HLA-BC molecules on tumor cells during therapy with exosomes. In addition, one minor, two stable and one mixed responses were observed in skin and lymph node sites. MAGE3 specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses could not be detected in peripheral blood.

conclusionThe first exosome Phase I trial highlighted the feasibility of large scale exosome production and the safety of exosome administration.

Identifiers

PMID15740633
PMCPMC554765
OpenAlexW1574663134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.