Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15736995›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2005

Use of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein to evaluate vaccine efficacy against pneumonia.

Shabir A Madhi, Jayvant R Heera, Locadiah Kuwanda, Keith P Klugman

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shabir A MadhiNational Health Laboratory Service, University of The Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. madhis@hivsa.com
Jayvant R Heera
Locadiah Kuwanda
Keith P Klugman
University of the Witwatersrand · ZANational Health Laboratory Service · ZARespiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia remains the leading cause of death in young children. The poor specificity of chest radiographs (CXRs) to diagnose pneumococcal pneumonia may underestimate the efficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in preventing pneumococcal pneumonia. METHODS AND

findingsThe efficacy of nine-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine among children not infected with HIV (21%; 95% confidence interval, 1%-37%) increased when CXR-confirmed pneumonia was associated with serum C-reactive protein of 120 mg/l (12 mg/dl) or more and procalcitonin of 5.0 ng/ml or more (64%; 95% confidence interval, 23%-83%). Similar results were observed in children infected with HIV.

conclusionC-reactive protein and procalcitonin improve the specificity of CXR to diagnose pneumococcal pneumonia and may be useful for the future evaluation of the effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in preventing pneumococcal pneumonia.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideChildC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodHIV InfectionsHumansPlacebosPneumococcal VaccinesPneumonia, PneumococcalProtein PrecursorsRadiography, ThoracicSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinPlacebosPneumococcal VaccinesProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID15736995
PMCPMC549587
OpenAlexW2072550087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.