Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15735718›Full record

ArticleOncogene2005

Induction of p21 by p53 following DNA damage inhibits both Cdk4 and Cdk2 activities.

Guangan He, Zahid H Siddik, Zaifeng Huang, Ruoning Wang, John Koomen, Ryuji Kobayashi, Abdul R Khokhar, Jian Kuang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 266 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CDKN1A/p21 in Breast Cancer: Part of the Problem, or Part of the Solution?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cellular senescence in glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023
    Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guangan HeDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Box 019, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Zahid H Siddik
Zaifeng Huang
Ruoning Wang
John Koomen
Ryuji Kobayashi
Abdul R Khokhar
Jian Kuang
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Effects of DNA Damaging Agents on G2 Phase CheckpointR01CA093941 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KUANG, JIAN · 2002 to 2005
$998k
CIRCUMVENTION OF CISPLATIN RESISTANCER01CA082361 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SIDDIK, ZAHID H · 1999 to 2002
$630k
MECHANISTIC DEVELOPMENT OF PLATINUM BASED DRUGSR01CA077332 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SIDDIK, ZAHID H · 1999 to 2001
$316k
NCI NIH HHS CA-77332NCI NIH HHS CA-82361NCI NIH HHS CA-93941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage often activates the p53-p21 pathway and causes G(1)-phase arrest in mammalian cells. Although there is ample evidence that p21 induction by p53 leads to Cdk2 inhibition, it is unclear whether this checkpoint event also leads to Cdk4 inhibition. Diaminocyclohexane(trans-diacetato)(dichloro) platinum(IV) (DAP), a platinum-based coordination complex, is a DNA-damaging agent that is effective against a variety of tumor cells resistant to the parental drug cisplatin. Our previous studies established that treatment of human cancer cells with low effective concentrations of DAP specifically activates the G(1)-phase checkpoint and simultaneously inhibit Cdk4 and Cdk2 activities. Here we demonstrate that DAP treatment of human cancer cells activates the p53-p21 pathway without activating other known mechanisms that inhibit Cdk4 and Cdk2 activities. The induced p21 binds to both the Cdk4/cyclin D and Cdk2/cyclin E complexes and inhibits both of their kinase activities. Conversely, inhibition of p21 induction by cycloheximide or by p21 gene deletion prevents DAP-induced inhibition of Cdk4 and Cdk2 activities. Attenuated p53 expression and p21 induction also eliminates DAP-induced G(1)-phase arrest and inhibition of Cdk4 and Cdk2 activities. Together, these findings establish that activation of the p53-p21 pathway is responsible for the DAP-induced G(1)-phase checkpoint response and provide the first solid evidence that p21 induction by p53 during a DNA damage-induced G(1)-phase checkpoint response inhibits both Cdk4 and Cdk2 activities.

Indexed as

CDC2-CDC28 KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Cyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA DamageG1 PhaseHumansProto-Oncogene ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53CDC2-CDC28 KinasesCDK2 protein, humanCDK4 protein, humanCDKN1A protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Cyclin-Dependent KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID15735718
OpenAlexW2052534784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.