Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15735298›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2005

Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.

R H Secker-Walker, R R Holland, C M Lloyd, D Pelkey, B S Flynn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2009
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R H Secker-WalkerThe Office of Health Promotion Research, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA. roger.secker-walker@.uvm.edu
R R Holland
C M Lloyd
D Pelkey
B S Flynn
University of Vermont · USVermont Department of Health · US

Funding

TUMOR GROWTH AND METASTASISP30CA022435 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI FOGARTY, JOHN P · 1985 to 2007
$9.6M
COMMUNITY COALITIONS TO HELP WOMEN QUIT SMOKINGR01HL040685 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SECKER-WALKER, ROGER H · 1989 to 1996
–
NCI NIH HHS CA22435NHLBI NIH HHS HL40685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the cost effectiveness of a four year, multifaceted, community based research project shown previously to help women quit smoking.

designA quasi-experimental matched control design.

settingTwo counties in Vermont and two in New Hampshire, USA. SUBJECTS: Women aged 18-64 years.

methodsCosts were the grant related expenditures converted to 2002 US dollars. Survey results at the end of the intervention were used to estimate the numbers of never smokers, former smokers, light smokers, and heavy smokers in the intervention and comparison counties, and 1986 life tables for populations of US women categorised by smoking status to estimate the gain in life expectancy.

main outcome measuresCost effectiveness ratios, as dollars per life-year saved, for the intervention only and for total grant costs (intervention, evaluation and indirect costs).

resultsThe cost effectiveness ratio for the intervention, in 2002 US dollars per life-year saved, discounted at 3%, was 1156 dollars (90% confidence interval (CI) 567 dollars to infinity), and for the total grant, 4022 dollars (90% CI 1973 dollars to infinity). When discounted at 5%, these ratios were 1922 dollars (90% CI 1024 dollars to 15,647 dollars), and 6683 dollars (90% CI 3555 dollars to 54,422 dollars), respectively.

conclusionThe cost effectiveness ratios of this research project are economically attractive, and are comparable with other smoking cessation interventions for women. These observations should encourage further research and dissemination of community based interventions to reduce smoking.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMiddle AgedNew HampshireQuality-Adjusted Life YearsResearchResearch DesignSmoking CessationVermont

Identifiers

PMID15735298
PMCPMC1747988
OpenAlexW2041918830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.