ArticleTobacco control2005
Cost effectiveness of a community based research project to help women quit smoking.
Article in Tobacco control, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions.BMC public health · 2017Pooled it
- Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2002Pooled it
- Incremental Benefits of Multiple Tobacco Control Interventions: A Factorial Randomized Control Trial.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Trial
- Encouraging smokers to quit: the cost effectiveness of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation treatment.PharmacoEconomics · 2006Trial
- Mobile contingency management for smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults: Protocol for a randomized trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Mathematical modelling in tobacco control research: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2015Article
- The Economic Impact of Smoking and of Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Review of Evidence.Tobacco use insights · 2015Review
- A review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2009Review
- 'People pull the rug from under your feet': barriers to successful public health programmes.BMC public health · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo estimate the cost effectiveness of a four year, multifaceted, community based research project shown previously to help women quit smoking.
designA quasi-experimental matched control design.
settingTwo counties in Vermont and two in New Hampshire, USA. SUBJECTS: Women aged 18-64 years.
methodsCosts were the grant related expenditures converted to 2002 US dollars. Survey results at the end of the intervention were used to estimate the numbers of never smokers, former smokers, light smokers, and heavy smokers in the intervention and comparison counties, and 1986 life tables for populations of US women categorised by smoking status to estimate the gain in life expectancy.
main outcome measuresCost effectiveness ratios, as dollars per life-year saved, for the intervention only and for total grant costs (intervention, evaluation and indirect costs).
resultsThe cost effectiveness ratio for the intervention, in 2002 US dollars per life-year saved, discounted at 3%, was 1156 dollars (90% confidence interval (CI) 567 dollars to infinity), and for the total grant, 4022 dollars (90% CI 1973 dollars to infinity). When discounted at 5%, these ratios were 1922 dollars (90% CI 1024 dollars to 15,647 dollars), and 6683 dollars (90% CI 3555 dollars to 54,422 dollars), respectively.
conclusionThe cost effectiveness ratios of this research project are economically attractive, and are comparable with other smoking cessation interventions for women. These observations should encourage further research and dissemination of community based interventions to reduce smoking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.