Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15735152›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2005

Pathobiology of brain metastases.

N Nathoo, A Chahlavi, G H Barnett, S A Toms

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Chemotherapy for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Abscess formation within brain metastasis.Surgical neurology international · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Advances in Brain Metastasis Models.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N NathooBrain Tumor Institute, Taussig Cancer Center and Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44122, USA.
A Chahlavi
G H Barnett
S A Toms
Cleveland Clinic · USCase Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastasis is a major cause of systemic cancer morbidity and mortality. Many factors participate in the development and maintenance of brain metastases. The survival of the metastasis depends upon crucial interactions between tumour cells and the brain microenvironment during its development at the new site. This review focuses on the pathobiological mechanisms involved in the establishment and regulation of brain metastases. Developments in molecular biology have vastly expanded our knowledge about the mechanisms of invasion, proliferation, metastatic cell signalling, and angiogenesis in brain metastases. Advances in this understanding of the pathobiology of brain metastasis may lead to novel targeted treatment paradigms and a better prognosis for patients with brain metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeovascularization, PathologicPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPTEN PhosphohydrolaseTumor Suppressor ProteinsPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15735152
PMCPMC1770599
OpenAlexW2132468732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.