Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15731234›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

B-cell responses in patients who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome target a dominant site in the S2 domain of the surface spike glycoprotein.

Xiaofen Zhong, Huanghao Yang, Zu-Feng Guo, Wan-Yee Fion Sin, Wei Chen, Junjie Xu, Ling Fu, Jie Wu, Chun-Kit Gannon Mak, Chak-Sum Samuel Cheng and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. How Useful is COVID-19 Antibody Testing - A Current Assessment for Oncologists.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaofen ZhongDepartment of Chemistry, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Huanghao Yang
Zu-Feng Guo
Wan-Yee Fion Sin
Wei Chen
Junjie Xu
Ling Fu
Jie Wu
Chun-Kit Gannon Mak
Chak-Sum Samuel Cheng
Yanzhen Yang
Shuyong Cao
Tin-Yau Wong
Sik-To Lai
Yong Xie
Zhihong Guo
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKAcademy of Military Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a recently emerged infectious disease caused by a novel strain of coronavirus. Examination of the immune responses of patients who have recovered from SARS should provide important information for design of a safe and effective vaccine. We determined the continuous viral epitopes targeted by antibodies in plasma samples from convalescent SARS patients through biopanning with a vast M13 phage display dodecapeptide library. These epitopes converged to very short peptide fragments, one on each of the structural proteins spike and nucleocapsid and the nonstructural proteins 3a, 9b, and nsp 3. Immunoassays found that most of the patients who had recovered from SARS developed complementary antibodies to the epitope-rich region on the spike S2 protein, indicating that this is an immunodominant site on the viral envelope comprising the spike, matrix, and small envelope glycoproteins. These S2-targeting antibodies were shown to effectively neutralize the coronavirus, indicating that they provided protective immunity to help the patients recover from the viral infection. These results suggest that the SARS coronavirus might have an antigenic profile distinct from those of other human or animal coronaviruses. Due to the tested safety and protective effects of the convalescent-phase serological antibodies, identification of their complementary antigens may enable the design of an epitope-based vaccine to prevent potential antibody-mediated immunopathology.

Indexed as

Immunodominant EpitopesAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralB-LymphocytesCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsEpitope MappingHong KongHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMiddle AgedNeutralization TestsNucleocapsid ProteinsPeptide LibrarySevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome3a protein, SARS-CoVAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsImmunodominant EpitopesMembrane Glycoproteinsnonstructural protein, coronavirusNucleocapsid ProteinsPeptide LibrarySpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike glycoprotein, SARS-CoVViral Envelope ProteinsViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral ProteinsViroporin Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15731234
PMCPMC1075701
OpenAlexW2123787670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.