Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15729515›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2005

Medical therapy of epilepsy: when to initiate treatment and when to combine?

Martin J Brodie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Seizures and epilepsy in children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetics of drug resistance in epilepsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin J BrodieEpilepsy Unit, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, G11 6NT, Scotland, UK. Martin.J.Brodie@clinmed.gla.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients reporting more than one well-documented or witnessed seizure require prophylactic antiepileptic (AED) therapy. Those with an underlying brain disorder and/or an abnormal electroencephalogram should probably be treated after their first event. The goal should be maintenance of a normal lifestyle by complete seizure control with no or minimal side-effects. Failure of the first AED due to lack of efficacy implies refractoriness. A policy of consecutive substitutions is unlikely to be an effective strategy. Thus, if the first or second monotherapy improves control but does not produce seizure freedom, an AED with different and perhaps multiple mechanisms of action should be added. Strategies for combining drugs should involve individual assessment of patient-related factors, including seizure type and epilepsy syndrome classifications coupled with an understanding of the pharmacology, side-effects and interaction profile of the AEDs. Reducing the dose of one or more AEDs may help accommodate the introduction of a second or third drug. An orderly approach to the pharmacological management and, when appropriate, surgical investigations for each epilepsy syndrome will optimise the chance of perfect seizure control and help more people achieve safer and more fulfilled lives.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyAnticonvulsantsDrug Therapy, CombinationElectric CountershockEpilepsyHumansPsychosurgeryTime FactorsTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.