ReviewJournal of neurology2005
Medical therapy of epilepsy: when to initiate treatment and when to combine?
Review in Journal of neurology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three dimensional microelectrodes enable high signal and spatial resolution for neural seizure recordings in brain slices and freely behaving animals.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy: An Overview on Existent and New Emerging Therapies.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Disabling tremor induced by long-term use of sodium valproate and lamotrigine: Case report.Medicine · 2017Article
- Seizures and epilepsy in children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2013Article
- Establishment of a comprehensive epilepsy center in pakistan: initial experiences, results, and reflections.Epilepsy research and treatment · 2012Article
- Genetics of drug resistance in epilepsy.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most patients reporting more than one well-documented or witnessed seizure require prophylactic antiepileptic (AED) therapy. Those with an underlying brain disorder and/or an abnormal electroencephalogram should probably be treated after their first event. The goal should be maintenance of a normal lifestyle by complete seizure control with no or minimal side-effects. Failure of the first AED due to lack of efficacy implies refractoriness. A policy of consecutive substitutions is unlikely to be an effective strategy. Thus, if the first or second monotherapy improves control but does not produce seizure freedom, an AED with different and perhaps multiple mechanisms of action should be added. Strategies for combining drugs should involve individual assessment of patient-related factors, including seizure type and epilepsy syndrome classifications coupled with an understanding of the pharmacology, side-effects and interaction profile of the AEDs. Reducing the dose of one or more AEDs may help accommodate the introduction of a second or third drug. An orderly approach to the pharmacological management and, when appropriate, surgical investigations for each epilepsy syndrome will optimise the chance of perfect seizure control and help more people achieve safer and more fulfilled lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15729515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.