Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15729064›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2005

Survival benefit in critically ill burned patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Miguel A de La Cal, Enrique Cerdá, Paloma García-Hierro, Hendrick K F van Saene, Dulce Gómez-Santos, Eva Negro, José Angel Lorente

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rebound Inverts theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miguel A de La CalDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain. mcal@ucigetafe.com
Enrique Cerdá
Paloma García-Hierro
Hendrick K F van Saene
Dulce Gómez-Santos
Eva Negro
José Angel Lorente

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether selective digestive decontamination (SDD) reduces mortality from any cause, and the incidence of pneumonia among patients with severe burns. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SDD is a prophylactic strategy to reduce infectious morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Two meta-analyses and a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated a mortality reduction varying between 20% and 40%. But this technique has never been properly evaluated in severely burned patients.

methodsThe design of this single-center trial was randomized, double blind, placebo controlled. Patients with burns > or =20% of total body surface and/or suspected inhalation injury were enrolled and assigned to receive SDD or placebo for the total duration of treatment in the burn intensive care unit (ICU).

resultsOne hundred seventeen patients were randomized and 107 were analyzed (53 in the SDD group and 54 in the placebo group). The ICU mortality was 27.8% in the placebo group and 9.4% in the SDD group in the burn ICU. Treatment with SDD was associated with a significant reduction in mortality both in the burn ICU (risk ratio 0.25; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76) and in the hospital (risk ratio 0.28; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.80), following adjustment for predicted mortality. The incidence of pneumonia was significantly higher in the placebo group: 30.8 and 17.0 pneumonias per 1000 ventilation days (P = 0.03) in placebo and SDD group, respectively.

conclusionsTreatment with SDD reduces mortality and pneumonia incidence in patients with severe burns.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDecontaminationAdultBurnsCritical IllnessCross InfectionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, BacterialSepsisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID15729064
PMCPMC1356980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.