Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15726398›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2005

The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society--rationale and current status.

Hanns-Peter Knaebel, Markus K Diener, Moritz N Wente, Hartwig Bauer, Markus W Büchler, Matthias Rothmund, Christoph M Seiler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Operative standardization in randomized controlled surgical trials. Meeting of the INSECT trial].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2006
    Trial
  3. [Rotating physician in CHIR-Net. Evaluation of the curriculum].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2013
    Article
  4. [The curriculum for rotation physicians within the CHIR-Net].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009
    Article
  5. [Design and evaluation of the University of Munich courses on research trials].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Project selection and protocol design in the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2006
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hanns-Peter KnaebelStudy Centre of the German Surgical Society, Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg Medical School, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus K Diener
Moritz N Wente
Hartwig Bauer
Markus W Büchler
Matthias Rothmund
Christoph M Seiler
German Society of Surgery · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of evidence-based medicine was introduced into surgery in the mid-1990s, initially focussing on the integration of best research evidence, surgeons' expertise and patients' value. The lack of relevant external evidence [randomised controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews] in favour of surgical procedures has led to the need for a new approach in clinical research.

designDevelopment and implementation of the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society (SDGC) in order to design, perform and analyse multicentre randomised controlled trials in surgery.

resultsThe German Surgical Society has recently initiated four surgical RCTs within the SDGC in order to improve the national infrastructure for clinical research and its international scientific standing. All surgical trials focus on procedures in various fields (thyroid and parathyroid diseases, pancreatic surgery, abdominal wall closure) and are designed to fit the specific needs of each study (blinding of patients and assessors, ranking of endpoints, patients' perspective). Additionally, in a nationwide survey of 1,274 surgical departments in Germany, 307 replied, of which 237 (19%) were willing to participate in multicentre projects.

conclusionEvidence-based medicine has changed surgical practice, leading to an increase in demand for RCTs and requiring a new infrastructure in surgical departments and scientific societies.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineGeneral SurgerySocieties, MedicalGermanyHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID15726398
OpenAlexW2058654574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.