Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15722022›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2005

A glucose-sensing contact lens: from bench top to patient.

Ramachandram Badugu, Joseph R Lakowicz, Chris D Geddes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Contact-Lens Biosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent developments in blood glucose sensors.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ramachandram BaduguCenter for Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 725 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Joseph R Lakowicz
Chris D Geddes
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USFluor (United States) · US

Funding

WHO'S WHO IN FLUORESCENCEP41RR008119 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BASKAKOV, ILIA V · 1993 to 2006
$7.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008119NCRR NIH HHS RR-08119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past few years we have seen the development of several new technologies for the continuous and non-invasive monitoring of physiological glucose, such as the GlucoWatch, glucose-sensing skin patches and approaches based on a glucose-sensing tattoo. One approach that differs from current thinking is based on the determination and monitoring of tear glucose, which is well known to track blood glucose with an approximate 30 min lag time, using disposable and colorless contact lenses. These contact lenses can be worn by diabetics who can colorimetrically see changes in their contact lens color or other fluorescence-based properties, giving an indication of tear and blood glucose levels.

Indexed as

Contact LensesBiosensing TechniquesBlood GlucoseColorimetryEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryTearsBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID15722022
PMCPMC4894302
OpenAlexW2109545888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.