Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15720937›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

The effectiveness of community maintenance with methadone or buprenorphine for treating opiate dependence.

Steven Simoens, Catriona Matheson, Christine Bond, Karen Inkster, Anne Ludbrook

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical guideline for homeless and vulnerably housed people, and people with lived homelessness experience.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Opioid dependence.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Opioid dependence.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Buprenorphine: new treatment of opioid addiction in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2011
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven SimoensDrug and Patient Information, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium. Steven.Simoens@pharm.kuleuven.ac.be
Catriona Matheson
Christine Bond
Karen Inkster
Anne Ludbrook
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpiate dependence is a major health and social issue in many countries. A mainstay of therapy has been methadone maintenance treatment, but other treatments, particularly buprenorphine, are increasingly being considered.

aimTo conduct a systematic review to synthesise and critically appraise the evidence on the effectiveness of community maintenance programmes with methadone or buprenorphine in treating opiate dependence.

methodA systematic review of databases, journals and the grey literature was carried out from 1990-2002. Inclusion criteria were: community-based, randomised controlled trials of methadone and/or buprenorphine for opiate dependence involving subjects who were aged 18 years old or over.

resultsTrials were set in a range of countries, employed a variety of comparators, and suffered from a number of biases. The evidence indicated that higher doses of methadone and buprenorphine are associated with better treatment outcomes. Low-dose methadone (20 mg per day) is less effective than buprenorphine (2-8 mg per day). Higher doses of methadone (>50-65 mg per day) are slightly more effective than buprenorphine (2-8 mg per day). There was some evidence that primary care could be an effective setting to provide this treatment, but such evidence was sparse.

conclusionThe literature supports the effectiveness of substitute prescribing with methadone or buprenorphine in treating opiate dependence. Evidence is also emerging that the provision of methadone or buprenorphine by primary care physicians is feasible and may be effective.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBuprenorphineCommunity Health ServicesHumansMethadoneMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsNarcoticsOpioid-Related DisordersPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBuprenorphineMethadoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID15720937
PMCPMC1463190
OpenAlexW2163464282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.