Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15718264›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2005

Mechanical activation of rectal intraganglionic laminar endings in the guinea pig distal gut.

Penny Lynn, Vladimir Zagorodnyuk, Grant Hennig, Marcello Costa, Simon Brookes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gut feelings: mechanosensing in the gastrointestinal tract.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electrophysiological characterization of human rectal afferents.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2016
    Article
  10. Mechanosensitivity in the enteric nervous system.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Extrinsic primary afferent signalling in the gut.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Visceral pain: the neurophysiological mechanism.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2009
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Penny LynnDepartment of Human Physiology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Vladimir Zagorodnyuk
Grant Hennig
Marcello Costa
Simon Brookes
Flinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rectum receives specialized extrinsic afferent innervation by stretch-sensitive, low threshold, slowly adapting mechanoreceptors, with transduction sites shown to correspond to rectal intraganglionic laminar endings (IGLEs). Rectal IGLEs are located in myenteric ganglia, surrounded by the longitudinal and circular smooth muscle layers; in this study we investigated the mechanical stimuli to which they respond. Mechanoreceptors had graded responses to highly focal transmural compression with von Frey hairs. They were activated when stretched circumferentially by imposed increases of both length and load. Under both conditions, firing typically occurred in bursts associated with phasic muscle contractions. However, many contractions did not evoke firing. Longitudinal stretch also evoked firing, again associated with contractile activity. Thus, mechanoreceptors did not show directional sensitivity. Two agonists that excited smooth muscle directly (0.1 microm [beta-Ala(8)]-neurokinin A (4-10) and 1 microm carbachol) activated rectal mechanoreceptors, but not in the presence of Ca(2)(+)-free solution or when preparations were kept entirely slack. We measured the dimensions, in both longitudinal and circumferential axes, of receptive fields during smooth muscle contractile activity, using video micrography. Contractile activity within the receptive field often differed significantly from the behaviour of the preparation as a whole, providing an explanation for many of the discrepancies between gross contractility and firing. Simultaneous contraction of both muscle layers within the receptive field was the strongest predictor of mechanoreceptor activation. Our results suggest that rectal mechanoreceptors do not act simply as tension receptors: rather they appear to detect mechanical deformation of myenteric ganglia - especially flattening - associated with stretch of the receptive field, or contractions of smooth muscle within the receptive field.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleGanglia, AutonomicGuinea PigsIn Vitro TechniquesMaleMechanoreceptorsMuscle SpindlesPhysical StimulationRectum

Identifiers

PMID15718264
PMCPMC1464445
OpenAlexW1563342819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.