Trial reportDer Radiologe2005
[Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].
Trial report in Der Radiologe, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].Der Radiologe · 2010Article
- [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].Der Radiologe · 2006Review
- [Radiation exposure of patients from diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures. Facts, assessment and trends].Der Radiologe · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For women between 50 and 70 years of age, X-ray mammography presently represents the most effective method for early breast cancer detection. It is commonly accepted that quality assured mammography examinations conducted at regular intervals can reduce mortality from breast cancer. In the year 2002, the German Bundestag agreed to the implementation of a mammography screening program for Germany based on the European guidelines. The effectiveness of a mammography screening program is controversially discussed and two of the most commonly cited hazards are the occurrence of false-positive results and the so-called overdiagnosis. Another issue of criticism is the radiation risk due to the mammography examinations. However, in women aged 50-70 years the radiation risk has no substantial importance. In contrast to the present situation in Germany in which opportunistic screening is widespread, standardized quality assured screening will guarantee that false-positive rates are kept as low as possible and that further assessment diagnostics are effective and minimally invasive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.