Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15717014›Full record

ReviewNeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2004

Neurodegeneration and neuroprotection in Parkinson disease.

Stanley Fahn, David Sulzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroRx : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Ameliorative effects ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Detection of α-Synuclein-Specific T Cells in Parkinson's Disease.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stanley FahnDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA. fahn@neuro.columbia.edu
David Sulzer
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of the motoric features that define Parkinson disease (PD) result primarily from the loss of the neuromelanin (NM)-containing dopamine (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra (SN), and to a lesser extent, other mostly catecholaminergic neurons, and are associated with cytoplasmic "Lewy body" inclusions in some of the surviving neurons. While there are uncommon instances of familial PD, and rare instances of known genetic causes, the etiology of the vast majority of PD cases remains unknown (i.e., idiopathic). Here we outline genetic and environmental findings related to PD epidemiology, suggestions that aberrant protein degradation may play a role in disease pathogenesis, and pathogenetic mechanisms including oxidative stress due to DA oxidation that could underlie the selectivity of neurodegeneration. We then outline potential approaches to neuroprotection for PD that are derived from current notions on disease pathogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainClinical Trials as TopicHumansNerve DegenerationNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsParkinson DiseaseNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID15717014
PMCPMC534919
OpenAlexW1982666490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.