Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15715909›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2005

Cancer/testis antigens and gametogenesis: a review and "brain-storming" session.

Martins Kalejs, Jekaterina Erenpreisa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The evolutionary cancer gene network theory versus embryogenic hypotheses.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Polyploidy as an Adaptation against Loss of Heterozygosity in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Immunomodulatory Effects of Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martins KalejsBiomedical Research and Study Centre of the Latvian University, Riga, Latvia. m.kalejs@no.lv.
Jekaterina Erenpreisa
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes expressed both in normal testis and in malignancies (Cancer/ Testis associated genes - CTA) have become the most extensively studied antigen group in the field of tumour immunology. Despite this, many fundamentally important questions remain unanswered: what is the connection between germ-cell specific genes and tumours? Is the expression of these genes yet another proof for the importance of genome destabilisation in the process of tumorigenesis?, or maybe activation of these genes is not quite random but instead related to some programme giving tumours a survival advantage?This review collates most of the recent information available about CTAs expression, function, and regulation. The data suggests a programme related to ontogenesis, mostly to gametogenesis. In the "brain-storming" part, facts in conflict with the hypothesis of random CTA gene activation are discussed. We propose a programme borrowed from organisms phylogenetically much older than humans, which existed before the differentiation of sexes. It is a programme that has served as a life cycle with prominent ploidy changes, and from which, as we know, the germ-cell ploidy cycle - meiosis - has evolved. Further work may show whether this hypothesis can lead to a novel anti-tumour strategy.

Identifiers

PMID15715909
PMCPMC552320
OpenAlexW1483737968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.