Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15712767›Full record

Trial reportAlternative therapies in health and medicine

A non-dairy probiotic's (poi) influence on changing the gastrointestinal tract's microflora environment.

Amy C Brown, Anne Shovic, Salam A Ibrahim, Peter Holck, Alvin Huang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alternative therapies in health and medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07446205 (Poi for Mama), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07446205 narecruitingnot on this map

Poi for Mama: a Pilot to Improve Maternal Microbiome and Gestational Diabetes Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of HawaiiRan2026 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsGestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), PregnancyArmsFermented Poi
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Health benefits of ethnic fermented foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy C BrownDepartment of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA.
Anne Shovic
Salam A Ibrahim
Peter Holck
Alvin Huang

Funding

WILLINGNESS OF PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS TO ADOPT HANDHELD COMPUTINGP20RR011091 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI ERDEM, GULIZ · 1995 to 2009
$16.5M
ROLE OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN GESTATIONAL DIABETESU54RR014607 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI MILLAR SAUVAGE, LYNNAE KAREN · 1999 to 2008
$15.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR011091NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR011091-11NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR11091NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR014607-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

justificationYogurt has been historically used to restore gut microflora adversely affected by antibiotic treatment. Certain fermented dairy products are probiotics; "live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit to the host." Microorganisms in foods may benefit certain health conditions such as diarrhea, gastroenteritis, irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer. A potential new probiotic from a Polynesian traditional food is poi; a starchy paste made from the corm of taro plants.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine if consumption of poi, a potential non-dairy probiotic, altered the microflora in the gastrointestinal tract of healthy adults.

methodsA cross-over clinical study included 18 subjects (19-64 years of age) divided into a poi group (n = 10) and control group (n = 8). The study duration of 14 weeks consisted of a 2-week washout, 4-week treatment or control, a subsequent 2-week washout, cross-over of 4-week treatment or control, and a final 2-week washout. Subjects thus served as their own controls. While receiving the poi treatment, participants consumed fresh poi (1-2 days old) three times a day (130 g/meal or approximately 1/2 cup/meal); the control group did not. Both groups filled out 3-day dietary records to ensure compliance. Measurable outcomes included pre- and post-treatment microbiological fecal culture analyses.

resultsWe found no significant differences in total bacterial counts following a poi diet versus following a control diet, nor were significant differences found in counts of specific bacterial species. Lactococcus tends to be higher in poi when it is analyzed for specific bacteria, but the poi consumption in our study did not alter the mean concentration of individual bacterial species (log10 CFU/g wet feces) for Escherichia coli, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, and Bifidobacterium. No significant differences in stool frequency or consistency were observed between the treatment and control group periods.

conclusionPoi consumption did not significantly alter total or individual bacterial counts in the human gastrointestinal tract. Further research might determine if "sour poi" (3-4 days old) has a greater affect than "fresh poi" (1-2 days old) as a potential probiotic, and a larger trial with longer diet durations may detect more subtle effects of poi consumption on bacterial counts.

Indexed as

ColocasiaAdultColony Count, MicrobialCross-Over StudiesFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractHumansIntestinesLacticaseibacillus caseiMaleMiddle AgedPhytotherapyPlant RootsProbioticsReference Values

Identifiers

PMID15712767
PMCPMC1364477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.