Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15710939›Full record

Trial reportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2005

Sexual risk behaviour of Canadian participants in the first efficacy trial of a preventive HIV-1 vaccine.

Thomas M Lampinen, Keith Chan, Robert S Remis, Maraki Fikre Merid, Melanie Rusch, Jean Vincelette, Ken Logue, Vladimir Popovic, Michel Alary, Martin T Schechter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Risk perceptions after human papillomavirus vaccination in HIV-infected adolescents and young adult women.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2012
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of an intervention among adolescents to reduce preventive misconception in HIV vaccine clinical trials.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas M LampinenBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC. tlampinen@cfenet.ubc.ca
Keith Chan
Robert S Remis
Maraki Fikre Merid
Melanie Rusch
Jean Vincelette
Ken Logue
Vladimir Popovic
Michel Alary
Martin T Schechter
Robert S Hogg
AIDS Vancouver · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhase I and phase II HIV-1 vaccine trials have revealed increases in risky sexual activity among study subjects during the trials, perhaps because the subjects believe that the vaccine being tested is efficacious; subjects may thus suffer harm from their participation. We evaluated the sexual behaviour of Canadian men who have sex with men (MSM) who participated in the phase III Vax004 trial of an HIV-1 vaccine.

methodsUsing self-reports of sexual behaviours during the 6 months before trial entry as a baseline, we determined changes in reported sexual behaviour after 6, 12 and 18 months of participation in the trial.

resultsOf 291 HIV-seronegative MSM enrolled from July to October 1999, 260 (89%) completed 18 months of follow-up, 19 (7%) experienced seroconversion, and 12 (4%) did not complete follow-up. Unprotected receptive anal intercourse during the previous 6 months with partners whose HIV-1 serostatus was positive or unknown was reported by 21% of men at enrollment and by 27% at any point during 18 months of follow-up. No increase in this behaviour from baseline was reported by participants, including among men who were motivated to enroll because of expected protection from HIV-1 infection, men who believed they had received the vaccine, men who believed that the vaccine had greater than 50% efficacy, or men who believed that they had received the vaccine and that vaccine efficacy was greater than 50%.

interpretationMSM can be successfully enrolled in HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trials without evident increases in those sexual behaviours most associated with HIV-1 risk.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV-1AdultFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHomosexuality, MaleHumansIllicit DrugsMaleSexual BehaviorUnsafe SexAIDS VaccinesIllicit Drugs

Identifiers

PMID15710939
PMCPMC548409
OpenAlexW2166695336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.