Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15705690›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Rectal artemether versus intravenous quinine for the treatment of cerebral malaria in children in Uganda: randomised clinical trial.

Jane Ruth Aceng, Justus S Byarugaba, James K Tumwine

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00113854 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Effect of Mannitol as Adjunct Therapy on the Clinical Outcome of Childhood Cerebral Malaria in Mulago Hospital: A Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMakerere UniversityRan2004 to 2005Enrolled156ConditionsCerebral MalariaArmsMannitol
NCT00124267 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy of Intrarectal Versus Intravenous Quinine for the Treatment of Childhood Cerebral Malaria: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMakerere UniversityRan2003 to 2004Enrolled108ConditionsCerebral MalariaArmsIntrarectal quinine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artemether for severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Artemether for severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Pre-referral rectal artesunate for severe malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Malaria: severe, life-threatening.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Malaria: severe, life-threatening.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jane Ruth AcengDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Makerere Medical School, PO Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Justus S Byarugaba
James K Tumwine
Makerere University · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of rectal artemether with intravenous quinine in the treatment of cerebral malaria in children.

designRandomised, single blind, clinical trial.

settingAcute care unit at Mulago Hospital, Uganda's national referral and teaching hospital in Kampala.

participants103 children aged 6 months to 5 years with cerebral malaria.

interventionPatients were randomised to either intravenous quinine or rectal artemether for seven days.

main outcome measuresTime to clearance of parasites and fever; time to regaining consciousness, starting oral intake, and sitting unaided; and adverse effects.

resultsThe difference in parasitological and clinical outcomes between rectal artemether and intravenous quinine did not reach significance (parasite clearance time 54.2 (SD 33.6) hours v 55.0 (SD 24.3) hours, P = 0.90; fever clearance time 33.2 (SD 21.9) hours v 24.1(SD 18.9 hours, P = 0.08; time to regaining consciousness 30.1 (SD 24.1) hours v 22.67 (SD 18.5) hours, P = 0.10; time to starting oral intake 37.9 (SD 27.0) hours v 30.3 (SD 21.1) hours, P = 0.14). Mortality was higher in the quinine group than in the artemether group (10/52 v 6/51; relative risk 1.29, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 2.01). No serious immediate adverse effects occurred.

conclusionRectal artemether is effective and well tolerated and could be used as treatment for cerebral malaria.

Indexed as

Administration, RectalAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfusions, IntravenousMalaria, CerebralParasitemiaQuinineSesquiterpenesSingle-Blind MethodSuppositoriesTime FactorsAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsQuinineSesquiterpenesSuppositories

Identifiers

PMID15705690
PMCPMC548725
OpenAlexW2050760927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.