ArticleClinical cardiology2005
The imbalance between coronary reserve and wall stress explains the severity of ventricular dysfunction in hypertension.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pathophysiologic role of coronary reserve impairment in hypertensive cardiac dysfunction is still debated. Previously, we demonstrated that satisfactory coronary vasodilatation may coexist with ventricular systolic dysfunction. It is conceivable that coronary reserve might otherwise be inappropriate for enhanced myocardial oxygen demand and may thus affect cardiac performance negatively. HYPOTHESIS: Myocardial supply-demand imbalance contributes to the severity of ventricular dysfunction in hypertension (HTN).
methodsFractional shortening (%) and end-systolic stress (10(3) x dyn x cm(-2)) were determined using echocardiography, and coronary reserve was calculated using transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Coronary reserve/stress (cm2 x dyn(-1)) was utilized as a measure of supply-demand. Groups NL (20 healthy subjects), HTN1 (15 patients, fractional shortening > or = 30), HTN2 (19 patients, 20 < or = fractional shortening < 30), and HTN3 (21 patients, fractional shortening < 20) were constituted.
resultsCompared with NL and HTN1, groups HTN2 and HTN3 had significantly (p < 0.05) greater end-systolic stress (NL = 72 +/- 16, HTN1 = 72 +/- 23, HTN2 = 143 +/- 32, HTN3 = 186 +/- 70). Coronary reserve was impaired in HTN3 alone (NL = 3.5 +/- 0.6, HTN1 = 3.4 +/- 1.0, HTN2 = 3.1 +/- 1.0, HTN3 = 2.6 +/- 1.1), but coronary reserve/stress was reduced in both HTN2 and HTN3 (NL = 50 +/- 12, HTN1 = 53 +/- 21, HTN2 = 22 +/- 7, HTN3 = 15 +/- 7). Stepwise regression analysis identified diastolic internal dimension, end-systolic stress, and coronary reserve/stress as independently associated with fractional shortening.
conclusionThe imbalance between supply-demand explains the severity of hypertensive cardiac dysfunction and adds information to cardiac enlargement and elevated wall stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.