ArticleGene therapy2005
Chemically inactivated adenoviral vectors that can efficiently transduce target cells when delivered in the form of virus-microbead conjugates.
Article in Gene therapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Site-specific gene delivery to stented arteries using magnetically guided zinc oleate-based nanoparticles loaded with adenoviral vectors.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2013Article
- Enhanced transduction of colonic cell lines in vitro and the inflamed colon in mice by viral vectors, derived from adeno-associated virus serotype 2, using virus-microbead conjugates bearing lectin.BMC biotechnology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Safe and effective use of viral vectors for gene therapeutics requires versatile control over their delivery to target sites in human subjects. We have developed a strategy for the creation of adenoviral vectors that possess conditional infectivity. The adenoviral vectors used were inactivated chemically such that they had little or no ability to infect cells. However, when such chemically inactivated adenoviral vectors were conjugated to the surfaces of appropriate microbeads and the resulting adenovirus-microbead conjugates were provided with the ability to associate stably with cells, the infectivity of these adenoviral vectors was restored. For certain target cell lines, the infectivity of such adenovirus-microbead conjugates became even higher than that of free, unmodified adenoviral vectors. As a result of the chemical inactivation of viral infectivity, any adenoviral particles that become free from the microbeads should be noninfectious. Thus, these adenoviral vectors have an infectivity that is conditional: They can only infect cells, to which their microbead conjugates come into stable contact. These results lay the groundwork for the creation of targetable adenovirus-microbead conjugates with greater efficacy and safety as delivery agents for gene therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.