Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15702351›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2005

The Penicillium chrysogenum-derived antifungal peptide shows no toxic effects on mammalian cells in the intended therapeutic concentration.

Henrietta Szappanos, Gyula Péter Szigeti, Balázs Pál, Zoltán Rusznák, Géza Szucs, Eva Rajnavölgyi, József Balla, György Balla, Emoke Nagy, Eva Leiter and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential of Antifungal Proteins (AFPs) to ControlJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biofungicidal Potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Three Antifungal Proteins FromFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Henrietta SzappanosDepartment of Physiology, RCMM, MHSC, University of Debrecen, P.O. Box 22, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gyula Péter Szigeti
Balázs Pál
Zoltán Rusznák
Géza Szucs
Eva Rajnavölgyi
József Balla
György Balla
Emoke Nagy
Eva Leiter
István Pócsi
Florentine Marx
László Csernoch
University of Debrecen · HUInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain filamentous fungi, such as the penicillin-producing strain Penicillium chrysogenum, secrete small, highly basic and cysteine-rich proteins with antifungal effects. Affected fungi include a number of important zoopathogens, including those infecting humans. Recent studies, however, have pointed to a membrane-perturbing effect of these antifungal compounds, apparent as a potassium efflux from affected fungal cells. If present on mammalian cells, this would severely hinder the potential therapeutic use of these molecules. Here we studied the effects of the P. chrysogenum-derived antifungal peptide (PAF) on a number of mammalian cells to establish whether the protein has any cytotoxic effects, alters transmembrane currents on excitable cells or activates the immune system. PAF, in a concentration range of 2-100 mug/ml, did not cause any cytotoxicity on human endothelial cells from the umbilical vein. Applied at 10 mug/ml, it also failed to modify voltage-gated potassium channels of neurones, skeletal muscle fibers, and astrocytes. PAF also left the hyperpolarization-activated non-specific cationic current (I(h)) and the L-type calcium current unaffected. Finally, up to 2 mug/ml, PAF did not induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-alpha. These results suggest that PAF should have only minor, if any, effects on mammalian cells in the intended therapeutic concentration range.

Indexed as

Penicillium chrysogenumAnimalsAntifungal AgentsElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyHippocampusHumansInterleukinsMuscle, SkeletalMuscle, Smooth, VascularNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelPotassiumRatsRats, WistarTissue Culture TechniquesTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntifungal AgentsInterleukinsPotassiumTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID15702351
OpenAlexW1995207385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.