Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15701804›Full record

ArticleEukaryotic cell2005

Elimination of foreign DNA during somatic differentiation in Tetrahymena thermophila shows position effect and is dosage dependent.

Yifan Liu, Xiaoyuan Song, Martin A Gorovsky, Kathleen M Karrer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eukaryotic cell, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Epigenetics of ciliates.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yifan LiuDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Xiaoyuan Song
Martin A Gorovsky
Kathleen M Karrer
University of Rochester · US

Funding

REPEATED GENES: ORGANIZATION, EVOLUTION, AND FUNCTIONR01GM021793 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI GOROVSKY, MARTIN A · 1985 to 2008
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-21793NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM021793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, approximately 15% of the germ line micronuclear DNA sequences are eliminated during formation of the somatic macronucleus. The vast majority of the internal eliminated sequences (IESs) are repeated in the micronuclear genome, and several of them resemble transposable elements. Thus, it has been suggested that DNA elimination evolved as a means for removing invading DNAs. In the present study, bacterial neo genes introduced into the germ line micronuclei were eliminated from the somatic genome. The efficiency of elimination from two different loci increased dramatically with the copy number of the neo genes in the micronuclei. The timing of neo elimination is similar to that of endogenous IESs, and they both produce bidirectional transcripts of the eliminated element, suggesting that the deletion of neo occurred by the same mechanism as elimination of endogenous IESs. These results indicate that repetition of an element in the micronucleus enhances the efficiency of its elimination from the newly formed somatic genome of Tetrahymena thermophila. The implications of these data in relation to the function and mechanism of IES elimination are discussed.

Indexed as

DNA, ProtozoanAnimalsCell DifferentiationGene SilencingMicronucleus, GermlineRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidTetrahymena thermophilaDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID15701804
PMCPMC549336
OpenAlexW2117722760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.