Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15696375›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2005

Mitochondrial genetic codes evolve to match amino acid requirements of proteins.

Jonathan Swire, Olivia P Judson, Austin Burt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analysis of the Entire Mitogenome of the Threatened Freshwater StingrayInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Revisiting the physico-chemical hypothesis of code origin: an analysis based on code-sequence coevolution in a finite population.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dual functions of codons in the genetic code.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan SwireCentre for Bioinformatics, Biochemistry Building, Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AY, UK. j.swire@imperial.ac.uk
Olivia P Judson
Austin Burt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondria often use genetic codes different from the standard genetic code. Now that many mitochondrial genomes have been sequenced, these variant codes provide the first opportunity to examine empirically the processes that produce new genetic codes. The key question is: Are codon reassignments the sole result of mutation and genetic drift? Or are they the result of natural selection? Here we present an analysis of 24 phylogenetically independent codon reassignments in mitochondria. Although the mutation-drift hypothesis can explain reassignments from stop to an amino acid, we found that it cannot explain reassignments from one amino acid to another. In particular--and contrary to the predictions of the mutation-drift hypothesis--the codon involved in such a reassignment was not rare in the ancestral genome. Instead, such reassignments appear to take place while the codon is in use at an appreciable frequency. Moreover, the comparison of inferred amino acid usage in the ancestral genome with the neutral expectation shows that the amino acid gaining the codon was selectively favored over the amino acid losing the codon. These results are consistent with a simple model of weak selection on the amino acid composition of proteins in which codon reassignments are selected because they compensate for multiple slightly deleterious mutations throughout the mitochondrial genome. We propose that the selection pressure is for reduced protein synthesis cost: most reassignments give amino acids that are less expensive to synthesize. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that mitochondrial genetic codes evolve to match the amino acid requirements of proteins.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino AcidsAnimalsBase SequenceCodonDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNA, MitochondrialHumansMitochondrial ProteinsModels, GeneticMutationPhylogenySelection, GeneticAmino AcidsCodonDNA, MitochondrialMitochondrial Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.