Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15695700›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Persistence of Escherichia coli O157 isolates on bovine farms in England and Wales.

Ernesto Liebana, Richard P Smith, Miranda Batchelor, Ian McLaren, Claire Cassar, Felicity A Clifton-Hadley, Giles A Paiba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Role ofToxins · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. stx genotype and molecular epidemiological analyses of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7/H- in human and cattle isolates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ernesto LiebanaDepartment of Food and Environment Safety, Veterinary Laboratories Agency--Weybridge, Addlestone, Surrey UK. E.liebana@VLA.DEFRA.gsi.gov.UK
Richard P Smith
Miranda Batchelor
Ian McLaren
Claire Cassar
Felicity A Clifton-Hadley
Giles A Paiba

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed pulsed-field gel electrophoresis on Escherichia coli O157 isolates (n = 318) from 199 healthy animals in a longitudinal study carried out on nine farms. Investigation of the restriction types proved that at the farm level, the same clones can be detected on sampling occasions separated by as much as 17 months. The cohort animals were repeatedly sampled, and for some of these, the same clones were obtained on sampling occasions separated by as much as 8 months.

Indexed as

Disease ReservoirsAgricultureAnimalsCattleDNA, BacterialElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnglandEscherichia coli O157Longitudinal StudiesWalesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID15695700
PMCPMC548034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.