Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15695686›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

In vitro method to study antifungal perfusion in Candida biofilms.

Y H Samaranayake, J Ye, J Y Y Yau, B P K Cheung, L P Samaranayake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Pathogenesis and Clinical Relevance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Host's Reply to Candida Biofilm.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fungal biofilms, drug resistance, and recurrent infection.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Candida species biofilm and Candida albicans ALS3 polymorphisms in clinical isolates.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Y H SamaranayakeOral Bioscience, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People's Republic of China.
J Ye
J Y Y Yau
B P K Cheung
L P Samaranayake

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimycotic perfusion through Candida biofilms was demonstrated by a modification of a simple in vitro diffusion cell bioassay system. Using this model, the perfusion of three commonly used antifungal agents, amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine, was investigated in biofilms of three different Candida species (i.e., Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida krusei) that were developed on microporous filters. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that C. albicans formed a contiguous biofilm with tightly packed blastospores and occasional hyphae compared with C. parapsilosis and C. krusei, which developed confluent biofilms displaying structural heterogeneity and a lesser cell density, after 48 h of incubation on nutrient agar. Minor structural changes were also perceptible on the superficial layers of the biofilm after antifungal perfusion. The transport of antifungals to the distal biofilm-substratum interface was most impeded by C. albicans biofilms in comparison to C. parapsilosis and C. krusei. Fluconazole and flucytosine demonstrated similar levels of perfusion, while amphotericin B was the least penetrant through all three biofilms, although the latter appeared to cause the most structural damage to the superficial cells of the biofilm compared with the other antifungals. These results suggest that the antifungal perfusion through biofilm mode of growth in Candida is dependent both on the antimycotic and the Candida species in question, and in clinical terms, these phenomena could contribute to the failure of Candida biofilm-associated infections. Finally, the in vitro model we have described should serve as a useful system to investigate the complex interactions that appear to operate in vivo within the biofilm-antifungal interphase.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsBiofilmsBiological AssayCandidaCandida albicansDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleFlucytosineHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicropore FiltersMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleFlucytosine

Identifiers

PMID15695686
PMCPMC548120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.