Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15695677›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Use of amplified fragment length polymorphism to identify and type Brucella isolates of medical and veterinary interest.

Adrian M Whatmore, Terry J Murphy, Stephen Shankster, Emma Young, Sally J Cutler, Alastair P Macmillan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distribution and epidemiology of brucellosis in China.Veterinary research communications · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Differentiation ofNew microbes and new infections · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian M WhatmoreDepartment of Statutory and Exotic Bacterial Diseases, Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Addlestone, Surrey, KT15 3NB UK. a.whatmore@vla.defra.gsi.gov.uk
Terry J Murphy
Stephen Shankster
Emma Young
Sally J Cutler
Alastair P Macmillan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a whole-genome fingerprinting method that relies on the selective PCR amplification of restriction fragments. The potential of this approach for the discrimination of Brucella isolates at the species and intraspecies level was assessed. A number of different combinations of restriction enzymes and selective primers were examined, and one, using EcoRI and MseI with additional selective TC bases on the MseI primer, was selected for full assessment against a panel of Brucella isolates. The technique could readily differentiate Brucella spp. from all Ochrobactrum spp. representing the group of organisms most closely related to Brucella spp. Application of AFLP highlighted the genetic homogeneity of Brucella. In spite of this determination of AFLP profiles of large numbers of isolates of human and animal origin, including Brucella abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis, B. neotomae, marine mammal isolates (no species name), B. canis, and B. suis, confirmed that all but the latter two species could be separated into distinct clusters based on characteristic and conserved differences in profile. Only B. suis and B. canis isolates clustered together and could not be distinguished by this approach, adding to questions regarding the validity of species assignments in this group. Under the conditions examined in the present study only limited intraspecies genomic differences were detected, and thus this AFLP approach is likely to prove most useful for identification to the species level. However, combination of several of the useful restriction enzyme-primer combinations identified in the present study could substantially add to the discriminatory power of AFLP when applied to Brucella and enhance the value of this approach.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthAnimalsBrucellaBrucellosisCattleDeoxyribonuclease EcoRIDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, BacterialHumansRabbitsSpecies SpecificityDeoxyribonuclease EcoRIDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, Bacterialendodeoxyribonuclease MseI

Identifiers

PMID15695677
PMCPMC548087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.