Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15693940›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2005

Comparison of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) nuclear genes in the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila pseudoobscura and Anopheles gambiae.

Gaetano Tripoli, Domenica D'Elia, Paolo Barsanti, Corrado Caggese

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mitochondrial Differentiation during Spermatogenesis: Lessons fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Using Mouse andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome-wide comparative analysis of four Indian Drosophila species.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AnOpen biology · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaetano TripoliUniversity of Bari, DAPEG Section of Genetics, via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy. g.tripoli@biologia.uniba.it
Domenica D'Elia
Paolo Barsanti
Corrado Caggese
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn eukaryotic cells, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) uses the products of both nuclear and mitochondrial genes to generate cellular ATP. Interspecies comparative analysis of these genes, which appear to be under strong functional constraints, may shed light on the evolutionary mechanisms that act on a set of genes correlated by function and subcellular localization of their products.

resultsWe have identified and annotated the Drosophila melanogaster, D. pseudoobscura and Anopheles gambiae orthologs of 78 nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation by a comparative analysis of their genomic sequences and organization. We have also identified 47 genes in these three dipteran species each of which shares significant sequence homology with one of the above-mentioned OXPHOS orthologs, and which are likely to have originated by duplication during evolution. Gene structure and intron length are essentially conserved in the three species, although gain or loss of introns is common in A. gambiae. In most tissues of D. melanogaster and A. gambiae the expression level of the duplicate gene is much lower than that of the original gene, and in D. melanogaster at least, its expression is almost always strongly testis-biased, in contrast to the soma-biased expression of the parent gene.

conclusionsQuickly achieving an expression pattern different from the parent genes may be required for new OXPHOS gene duplicates to be maintained in the genome. This may be a general evolutionary mechanism for originating phenotypic changes that could lead to species differentiation.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectAnimalsAnophelesCell NucleusChromosome MappingCodonDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene DuplicationGene ExpressionGenome, InsectInsect ProteinsIntronsMitochondrial ProteinsOxidative PhosphorylationCodonDrosophila ProteinsInsect ProteinsMitochondrial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15693940
PMCPMC551531
OpenAlexW2148664612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.