Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15693932›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2005

Race and family history assessment for breast cancer.

Harvey J Murff, Daniel Byrne, Jennifer S Haas, Ann Louise Puopolo, Troyen A Brennan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00977847 (Integrating Patient Generated Family Health History From Varied Electronic Health Record Entry Portals), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00977847 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Integrating Patient Generated Family Health History From Varied Electronic Health Record Entry Portals

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2010 to 2012Enrolled5,000ConditionsFamily Characteristics, Health Status, Family ResearchArmsElectronic Health Portals for collecting Family History data
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disparities in genetic services utilization in a random sample of young breast cancer survivors.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Breast Cancer Disparities and the Digital Divide.Current breast cancer reports · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Health Care Segregation, Physician Recommendation, and Racial Disparities in BRCA1/2 Testing Among Women With Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Promoter methylation status and expression of estrogen receptor alpha in familial breast cancer patients.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Coherence and completeness of population-based family cancer reports.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harvey J MurffDivision of General Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN 37212-2637, USA. Harvey.Murff@med.va.gov
Daniel Byrne
Jennifer S Haas
Ann Louise Puopolo
Troyen A Brennan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveStudies have demonstrated disparities in breast cancer screening between racial and ethnic groups. Knowledge of a woman's family history of breast cancer is important for initiating early screening interventions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences exist in the collection of family history information based on patient race.

designCross-sectional patient telephone interview and medical record review.

settingEleven primary care practices in the Greater Boston area, all associated with Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals.

participantsOne thousand seven hundred fifty-nine women without a prior history of breast cancer who had been seen at least once by their primary care provider during the prior year. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsData were collected on patients regarding self-reported race, family breast cancer history information, and breast cancer screening interventions. Twenty-six percent (462/1,759) of the sample had documentation within their medical record of a family history for breast cancer. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for patient age, education, number of continuous years in the provider's practice, language, and presentation with a breast complaint, white women were more likely to be asked about a breast cancer family history when compared to nonwhite women (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 2.35).

conclusionsThe majority of women seen by primary care providers do not have documentation of a family breast cancer history assessment within their medical record. White women were more likely to have family breast cancer information documented than nonwhites.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsBreast Self-ExaminationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMedical History TakingMedical RecordsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID15693932
PMCPMC1490028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.