ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2005
BCL1 lymphoma protection induced by idiotype DNA vaccination is entirely dependent on anti-idiotypic antibodies.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dengue E Protein Domain III-Based DNA Immunisation Induces Strong Antibody Responses to All Four Viral Serotypes.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015Article
- Idiotypes as immunogens: facing the challenge of inducing strong therapeutic immune responses against the variable region of immunoglobulins.Frontiers in oncology · 2012Article
- Developing idiotype vaccines for lymphoma: from preclinical studies to phase III clinical trials.British journal of haematology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA vaccination with the idiotype (Id) of tumour B-cell membrane immunoglobulins (Ig) is a validated strategy to induce tumour protection to several mouse lymphomas. The relative contribution of anti-Id antibodies and T lymphocytes to tumour rejection is still debated. Previous studies in the BCL1 lymphoma model showed that scFv DNA immunisation induces a polyclonal antibody response restricted to conformational epitopes formed by the parental V(L)/V(H) association. We implemented a system based on this specificity to investigate the mechanism of BCL1 lymphoma protection induced by DNA immunisation. Antibody response and survival of mice immunised with the tumour Id scFv were compared with those of mice immunised simultaneously with two chimeric scFvs, containing either the tumour-derived V(L) or V(H) paired to an irrelevant V(H) or V(L) domain, respectively. Animals vaccinated with one or both chimeric constructs were not protected, despite the exposure to all putative tumour Id-derived MHC class I and class II T-cell epitopes. In addition, conformational antibodies induced by DNA vaccination caused tumour cells apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in vitro and transferred protection in vivo. Therefore, lymphoma rejection appears to be completely dependent on the induction of anti-Id antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.