Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15692736›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2005

Influence of chemical shift tolerances on NMR structure calculations using ARIA protocols for assigning NOE data.

Michele Fossi, Jens Linge, Dirk Labudde, Dietmar Leitner, Michael Nilges, Hartmut Oschkinat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele FossiForschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Jens Linge
Dirk Labudde
Dietmar Leitner
Michael Nilges
Hartmut Oschkinat

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale protein structure determination by NMR via automatic assignment of NOESY spectra requires the adjustment of several parameters for optimal performance. Among those are the chemical shift tolerance windows (delta), which allow for the compensation of badly matching chemical shifts in the assignment-list and peak-lists, and the maximum number of assignment possibilities allowed per peak (n(max)). Here, we test the influence of different values for Delta and n(max) on the performance of automated assignment of NOESY spectra by ARIA. Using Cesta.py (a Python script available from http://pasteur.fr/binfs/), we analyse the number of rejected peaks and the average number of assignments as a function of Delta and derive criteria for optimising delta and n(max) prior to structure calculation. The analysis also makes it possible to detect inconsistencies in the dataset, e.g., badly matching frequencies in the NOESY peak-lists and in the provided assignment-list. We show that ARIA can deal with a large number of assignment possibilities for each peak, provided the correct option is present, and that consequently narrow tolerances should be avoided.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.