ReviewDrug safety2005
Immunotoxicology: role in the safety assessment of drugs.
Review in Drug safety, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Enhanced Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) Inhibitors Beyond Curcumin Through Virtual Screening to Target Inflammation-Related Metabolic Complications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Safety Assessment ofJournal of toxicology · 2026Article
- Synthesis, anticancer evaluation, and electrochemical investigation of new chiral pyrazolo[4,3-e]tetrazolo[1,5-b][1,2,4]triazine sulfonamides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Synthesis, Computational, and Anticancer In Vitro Investigations of Aminobenzylnaphthols Derived from 2-Naphtol, Benzaldehydes, and α-Aminoacids via the Betti Reaction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Immunological Responses of Arsenicum album 30CH to Combat COVID-19: Protocol for a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial in the Pathanamthitta District of Kerala.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Critical review of nucleic acid nanotechnology to identify gaps and inform a strategy for accelerated clinical translation.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- Humanized Mouse as a Tool to Predict Immunotoxicity of Human Biologics.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Subchronic and chronic toxicity evaluation of inorganic nanoparticles for delivery applications.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019Review
- Article
- A comparison of immunotoxic effects of nanomedicinal products with regulatory immunotoxicity testing requirements.International journal of nanomedicine · 2016Review
- Natural product-derived drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.Intestinal research · 2014Review
- Review
- Nutrition of the critically ill - emphasis on liver and pancreas.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2012Review
- Surrogate end points in the design of immunotherapy trials: emerging lessons from type 1 diabetes.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2010Review
- Evaluation of apoptosis in immunotoxicity testing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010Article
- The protective effects ofAvicenna journal of phytomedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The immunotoxic effects of drugs are divided into immunosuppression, immunostimulation, hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The major adverse consequences of immunosuppression are infectious complications and virus-induced malignancies. Flu-like reactions, more frequent autoimmune diseases and hypersensitivity reactions to unrelated allergens, and inhibition of drug-metabolising enzymes are the adverse effects related to immunostimulation. Hypersensitivity reactions are the most frequent immunotoxic effects of drugs. They include immune-mediated ('allergic') and non immune-mediated ('pseudoallergic') reactions. Drug-induced autoimmune reactions, either systemic or organ-specific, are seemingly rare. A review of drug-induced immunotoxic effects demonstrates that immunotoxicity is a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. As immunotoxicologists have long focused on immunosuppression, the nonclinical immunotoxicity safety assessment of unexpected immunosuppression is based on a number of relatively well standardised and validated animal models and assays. However, there is no general consensus regarding the minimal requirement for this assessment. Many different assays can be used to extend the assessment case by case. Few animal models and assays have been validated for use in the nonclinical safety assessment of unexpected immunostimulation. The situation is worse regarding the prediction of hypersensitivity and autoimmune reactions. Our limited understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of immunotoxicity accounts, at least partly, for this situation. Recent guidelines for the immunotoxicity safety assessment of drugs, even though conflicting on several points, will serve as an impetus not only to refine current animal models and assays, but also to search for better alternatives. The new data generated will have to be interpreted and extended to animal species other than just rodents. Likewise, animal results will have to be compared with findings in humans. The search for immunological endpoints that can be used in several animal species and in humans will therefore become essential. Specific endpoints and clinical criteria that can be included in clinical trials to further investigate the potential for immunotoxicity of new drugs will have to be defined. Because immunotoxicity plays a key role in drug-induced adverse effects, the role of immunotoxicology in drug safety assessment is indisputable and the systematic nonclinical as well as clinical immunotoxicity assessment of every new drug is deemed essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.