Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15688024›Full record

ArticleOncogene2005

Nonhomologous end-joining of site-specific but not of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks is reduced in the presence of wild-type p53.

Jochen Dahm-Daphi, Petra Hubbe, Fruzsina Horvath, Raafat A El-Awady, Katie E Bouffard, Simon N Powell, Henning Willers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drugging in the absence of p53.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. DNA Damage and Pulmonary Hypertension.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromosome instability and deregulated proliferation: an unavoidable duo.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jochen Dahm-DaphiLaboratory of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Petra Hubbe
Fruzsina Horvath
Raafat A El-Awady
Katie E Bouffard
Simon N Powell
Henning Willers
Universität Hamburg · DEMassachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

DNA REPAIR--ROLE OF THE P53 TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINR01CA058985 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SIMON N. · 1992 to 2010
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA58985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) entails two principal mechanisms: modification of DNA ends prior to ligation (error-prone rejoining) or precise ligation without modification if the DNA ends are complementary (error-free repair). Error-prone rejoining is mutagenic, because it can lead to destruction of coding sequence or to chromosomal aberrations, and therefore must be tightly regulated. Previous studies on the role of the p53 tumor suppressor in the regulation of NHEJ have yielded conflicting results, but a rigorous analysis of NHEJ proficiency and fidelity in a purely chromosomal context has not been carried out. To this end, we created novel repair plasmid substrates that integrate into the genome. DSBs generated by the I-SceI endonuclease within these substrates were repaired by either error-prone rejoining or precise ligation. We found that the expression of wild-type p53 inhibited any repair-associated DNA sequence deletion, including a more than 250-fold inhibition of error-prone rejoining events compared to p53-null cells, while any promoting effect of p53 on precise ligation could not be directly evaluated. The role of p53 in NHEJ appeared to involve a direct transactivation-independent mechanism, possibly restricting DNA end-modification by blocking the annealing of single strands along flanking stretches of microhomology. The inhibition of error-prone rejoining by p53 did not apply to the rejoining of DSBs induced by ionizing radiation. In conclusion, our data suggest that p53 restricts the mutagenic effects of NHEJ without compromising repair proficiency or cell survival, thereby maintaining genomic stability.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsBase SequenceCells, CulturedDNADNA RepairMiceMolecular Sequence DataTumor Suppressor Protein p53DNATumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID15688024
OpenAlexW1986802053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.