Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15687504›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species.

Roded Sharan, Silpa Suthram, Ryan M Kelley, Tanja Kuhn, Scott McCuine, Peter Uetz, Taylor Sittler, Richard M Karp, Trey Ideker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 251 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
251citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

251 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. On the Origin of Biomolecular Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Functional Analysis of Hypothetical Proteins ofBioinformatics and biology insights · 2022
    Article
  19. Functional Annotation of Hypothetical Proteins From theBioinformatics and biology insights · 2022
    Article
  20. Computationally Reconstructed Interactome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article

191 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Roded SharanComputer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.
Silpa Suthram
Ryan M Kelley
Tanja Kuhn
Scott McCuine
Peter Uetz
Taylor Sittler
Richard M Karp
Trey Ideker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To elucidate cellular machinery on a global scale, we performed a multiple comparison of the recently available protein-protein interaction networks of Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This comparison integrated protein interaction and sequence information to reveal 71 network regions that were conserved across all three species and many exclusive to the metazoans. We used this conservation, and found statistically significant support for 4,645 previously undescribed protein functions and 2,609 previously undescribed protein interactions. We tested 60 interaction predictions for yeast by two-hybrid analysis, confirming approximately half of these. Significantly, many of the predicted functions and interactions would not have been identified from sequence similarity alone, demonstrating that network comparisons provide essential biological information beyond what is gleaned from the genome.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDatabases, Nucleic AcidDrosophila ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15687504
PMCPMC548573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.