ReviewHistochemistry and cell biology2005
Microscopy and cytochemistry of the biogenesis of the parasitophorous vacuole.
Review in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide analysis of differentially expressed profiles of mRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs during Cryptosporidium baileyi infection.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Expression and the Peculiar Enzymatic Behavior of the Trypanosoma cruzi NTH1 DNA Glycosylase.PloS one · 2016Article
- The effects of macrophage source on the mechanism of phagocytosis and intracellular survival of Leishmania.Microbes and infection · 2011Article
- The histochemistry and cell biology vade mecum: a review of 2005-2006.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2006Review
- Recent progress in histochemistry and cell biology: the state of the art 2005.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2005Review
- Toxoplasma gondii actively remodels the microtubule network in host cells.Microbes and infectionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some parasitic protozoa are able to penetrate into host cells where they multiply. The process of penetration involves steps such as attachment to the host cell surface, internalization of the protozoan through an endocytic process with the formation of a parasitophorous vacuole (PV), and the subsequent interaction of the protozoan with the membrane lining the PV. This review analyzes the biogenesis of the PV from a morphological and cytochemical perspective. Special emphasis is given to (a) the localization of plasma membrane-associated enzymes such as Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, Ca(2+)-ATPase, 5'-nucleotidase, and NAD(P)H-oxidase, (b) glycoconjugates, detected using labeled lectins, (c) anionic sites, detected using cationic particles, and (d) integral membrane proteins, using freeze-fracture replicas, and lipids during the formation of the PV containing Trypanosoma cruzi, Leishmania, Toxoplasma gondii, and Plasmodium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.