Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15684078›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Characterizing functional hippocampal pathways in a brain-based device as it solves a spatial memory task.

Jeffrey L Krichmar, Douglas A Nitz, Joseph A Gally, Gerald M Edelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Design Principles for Neurorobotics.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022
    Article
  3. Neurobiologically Inspired Self-Monitoring Systems.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unlocking neural complexity with a robotic key.The Journal of physiology · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. From baconian to popperian neuroscience.Neural systems & circuits · 2012
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Causal networks in simulated neural systems.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Retrospective and prospective responses arising in a modeled hippocampus during maze navigation by a brain-based device.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
  15. A cerebellar model for predictive motor control tested in a brain-based device.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey L KrichmarThe Neurosciences Institute, 10640 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA. krichmar@nsi.edu
Douglas A Nitz
Joseph A Gally
Gerald M Edelman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing neural dynamics underlying complex behavior is a major challenge in systems neurobiology. To meet this challenge through computational neuroscience, we have constructed a brain-based device (Darwin X) that interacts with a real environment, and whose behavior is guided by a simulated nervous system incorporating detailed aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the hippocampus and its surrounding regions. Darwin X integrates cues from its environment to solve a spatial memory task. Place-specific units, similar to place cells in the rodent, emerged by integrating visual and self-movement cues during exploration without prior assumptions in the model about environmental inputs. Because synthetic neural modeling using brain-based devices allows recording from all elements of the simulated nervous system during behavior, we were able to identify different functional hippocampal pathways. We did this by tracing back from reference neuronal units in the CA1 region of the simulated hippocampus to all of the synaptically connected units that were coactive during a particular exploratory behavior. Our analysis identified a number of different functional pathways within the simulated hippocampus that incorporate either the perforant path or the trisynaptic loop. Place fields, which were activated by the trisynaptic circuit, tended to be more selective and informative. However, place units that were activated by the perforant path were prevalent in the model and were crucial for generating appropriate exploratory behavior. Thus, in the model, different functional pathways influence place field activity and, hence, behavior during navigation.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBehaviorHippocampusMaze LearningMemory

Identifiers

PMID15684078
PMCPMC548312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.