Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15684068›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

DNA cleavage in immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation depends on de novo protein synthesis but not on uracil DNA glycosylase.

Hitoshi Nagaoka, Satomi Ito, Masamichi Muramatsu, Mikiyo Nakata, Tasuku Honjo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. APE1 is dispensable for S-region cleavage but required for its repair in class switch recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nonimmunoglobulin target loci of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) share unique features with immunoglobulin genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  10. Foxp3 expression in p53-dependent DNA damage responses.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Further evidence for involvement of a noncanonical function of uracil DNA glycosylase in class switch recombination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  15. AID to overcome the limitations of genomic information by introducing somatic DNA alterations.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2006
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Activation-induced deaminase cloning, localization, and protein extraction from young VH-mutant rabbit appendix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hitoshi NagaokaDepartment of Medical Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Satomi Ito
Masamichi Muramatsu
Mikiyo Nakata
Tasuku Honjo
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is required for the DNA cleavage step of Ig somatic hypermutation (SHM). However, its molecular mechanism is controversial. The RNA editing hypothesis postulates that AID deaminates cytosine in an unknown mRNA to generate a new mRNA encoding SHM endonuclease. On the other hand, the DNA deamination hypothesis explains DNA cleavage by cytosine deamination in DNA, followed by uracil removal by uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG). By using the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide, we showed that SHM requires de novo protein synthesis in accord with predictions by the RNA editing hypothesis. In addition, we found that cycloheximide but not Ugi (the specific inhibitor of UNG) inhibited AID-dependent DNA cleavage in the Ig gene during SHM, by using histone H2AX focus formation as a marker of DNA cleavage. The results indicate the following order of events: AID expression, protein synthesis, DNA cleavage, and SHM. The requirement of protein synthesis but not of UNG for the DNA cleavage step of SHM forces us to reconsider the DNA deamination hypothesis and strengthens the RNA editing hypothesis.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisSomatic Hypermutation, ImmunoglobulinAICDA (Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase)AnimalsCell LineCycloheximideCytidine DeaminaseCytosine DeaminaseDNADNA GlycosylasesFibroblastsHistonesHumansMiceProtein Synthesis InhibitorsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAICDA (Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase)CycloheximideCytidine DeaminaseCytosine DeaminaseDNADNA GlycosylasesH2AX protein, humanHistonesProtein Synthesis InhibitorsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsUracil-DNA Glycosidase

Identifiers

PMID15684068
PMCPMC548564
OpenAlexW2156103152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.