Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15684023›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2005

Systematic review and meta-analysis of proton pump inhibitor therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding.

Grigoris I Leontiadis, Virender K Sharma, Colin W Howden

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. The impact of proton pump inhibitor use on fusion rates following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Who Needs Gastroprotection in 2020?Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Fracture Risk: A Review of Current Evidence and Mechanisms Involved.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Grigoris I LeontiadisDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Durham, Durham DH1 5TW.
Virender K Sharma
Colin W Howden
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity Hospital of North Durham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review randomised controlled trials of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor in patients with ulcer bleeding and determine the impact on mortality, rebleeding, and surgical intervention.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Collaboration's trials register, Medline, and Embase, handsearched abstracts, and pharmaceutical companies. REVIEW

methodsIncluded randomised controlled trials compared proton pump inhibitor with placebo or H2 receptor antagonist in endoscopically proved bleeding ulcer and reported at least one of mortality, rebleeding, or surgical intervention. Trials were graded for methodological quality. Two assessors independently reviewed each trial, and disagreements were resolved by consensus.

resultsWe included 21 randomised controlled trials comprising 2915 patients. Proton pump inhibitor treatment had no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.57; number needed to treat (NNT) incalculable) but reduced rebleeding (0.46, 0.33 to 0.64; NNT 12) and surgery (0.59, 0.46 to 0.76; NNT 20). Results were similar when the meta-analysis was restricted to the 10 trials with the highest methodological quality: 0.96, 0.46 to 2.01, for mortality; 0.41, 0.25 to 0.68, NNT 10, for rebleeding; 0.62, 0.46 to 0.83, NNT 25, for surgery.

conclusionsTreatment with a proton pump inhibitor reduces the risk of rebleeding and the requirement for surgery after ulcer bleeding but has no benefit on overall mortality.

Indexed as

Proton Pump InhibitorsAnti-Ulcer AgentsHumansOdds RatioPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeAnti-Ulcer AgentsProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15684023
PMCPMC554028
OpenAlexW2123254230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.