Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15683610›Full record

ArticleCurrent allergy and asthma reports2005

Targeting immunoglobulin E as a novel treatment for asthma.

Thomas Sandström

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas SandströmDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, University Hospital, SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden. thomas.sandstrom@lung.umu.se
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omalizumab is a recently developed monoclonal anti-IgE antibody. Clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe or poorly controlled allergic asthma, in patients with seasonal and perennial allergic disease, and in subjects with concomitant asthma and allergic rhinitis. Patients with more severe asthma appear to obtain the greatest benefit from omalizumab therapy. Omalizumab is well tolerated and has a good safety profile. Anti-inflammatory activity has been shown in both allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis. These results confirm the importance of IgE in allergic disease and support the rationale behind the development of a therapeutic anti-IgE antibody. Omalizumab is a significant addition to current asthma treatments and shows great promise as a therapy for allergic rhinitis, in particular for those patients with concomitant allergic disease.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaHumansOmalizumabRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedOmalizumab

Identifiers

PMID15683610
OpenAlexW1969066465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.