ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Potential factors that may affect acceptance of routine prenatal HIV testing.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indigenous Women's Resistance of Colonial Policies, Practices, and Reproductive Coercion.Qualitative health research · 2022Article
- Examination of a Canadian provincial prenatal HIV screening program: 2010 to 2014.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020Article
- Examination of a prenatal syphilis screening program, Alberta, Canada: 2010-2011.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2016Article
- Women's willingness to be tested for human immunodeficiency virus during pregnancy: A review.World journal of virology · 2015Review
- Article
- Promising outcomes of a national programme for the prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV transmission in Addis Ababa: a retrospective study.BMC health services research · 2010Article
- Routine HIV testing in Botswana: a population-based study on attitudes, practices, and human rights concerns.PLoS medicine · 2006Article
- High HIV-TB co-infection rates in marginalized populations: evidence from Alberta in support of screening TB patients for HIV.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
- The feasibility of using an 'opt-out' approach to achieve universal HIV testing of tuberculosis patients in Alberta.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
- Screening HIV in pregnancy: a survey of prenatal care patients.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publiqueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite increasing advocacy for an "opt-out" strategy in routine prenatal HIV screening programs in Canada, no published studies have examined factors that may affect acceptance of prenatal HIV testing.
methodsWe included all pregnant women in Alberta who received prenatal care (N = 38,712) and their caregivers (N = 2,007) between January 1 and November 30, 2000. Factors associated with non-acceptance of HIV testing in both pregnant women and their caregivers were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.
resultsOverall, 1.5% of women declined HIV testing. First Nations women were about twice as likely to decline the test (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)] 1.91, 95% CI [1.42-2.58]) compared to non-First Nations women (p < 0.001). The proportion also increased with age (chi2 trend p < 0.001) in the general population. In First Nations women, however, most (3.2%) declined in the 20-24 year age group. No significant effect was seen for a socio-economic status marker or for the place of residence. The caregivers of women who declined HIV testing were more likely to be female (OR(adj) 1.56 [1.28-1.89]), midwives (OR(adj) 140.65 [58.61-337.49]), other non-obstetrical medical specialties (OR(adj) 4.92 [1.94-12.47]), and general practitioners (OR(adj) 3.44 [1.87-6.33]).
conclusionIn an "opt-out" routine prenatal HIV screening program, the characteristics of both the pregnant women and their caregivers may contribute to the non-acceptance of HIV testing. A higher likelihood of declining HIV testing among First Nations pregnant women and other pregnant women under the care of midwives and female physicians warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15682699PMC6976195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.