ArticleThorax2005
Trends in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms and treatment in Dutch children over a 12 year period: results of the fourth consecutive survey.
Article in Thorax, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of a diagnostic model based on immune-related genes in children with asthma.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The burden of asthma in an inner-city area: A historical review 10 years after Isaac.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Article
- Global strategies for reducing the burden from asthma.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013Article
- Childhood asthma: diagnosis and treatment.Scientifica · 2012Review
- Importance of allergy in asthma: an epidemiologic perspective.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2011Review
- Fat intake and asthma in Spanish schoolchildren.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2010Article
- Article
- Understanding genomics: implications for the emergency medicine physician and the treatment of asthma.Pediatric emergency care · 2006Review
- Prevalence of asthma among Middle Eastern children: A systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of IranReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough there is considerable evidence that the prevalence of childhood asthma has increased over the last decades, it is not clear if this trend is still ongoing. A study was undertaken to investigate whether previously observed trends in the prevalence of respiratory symptoms, physician visits, medication use, and absence from school in Dutch children aged 8-9 years persisted in 2001.
methodsParents of 1154 children aged 8-9 years eligible for a routine physical examination in 2001 were asked to complete a questionnaire on the respiratory health of their child.
resultsIn 2001, 1102 children (95.5%) participated in the survey. Similarly high response rates were obtained in the surveys of 1989, 1993 and 1997, with 1794, 1526 and 1670 children aged 8-9 years participating in the respective surveys. The decreasing trend previously observed for recent wheeze between 1989 and 1997 persisted into 2001, particularly in boys. After increasing between 1989 and 1997, the prevalence of shortness of breath with wheeze decreased between 1997 and 2001. The proportion of wheezy children using medication increased between 1989 and 2001 in boys (42.9% v 64.8%; p = 0.003), but the increase was not statistically significant in girls (34.0% v 45.7%; p = 0.096).
conclusionThe prevalence of recent wheeze in Dutch school children has declined steadily since 1989. The rising prevalence of medication use in symptomatic children over time may reflect better asthma control and may partly explain the concurrently decreasing trend in the prevalence of asthma symptoms in our study population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.