Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15681457›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2005

An optimized CD8+ T-cell response controls productive and latent gammaherpesvirus infection.

Douglas C Braaten, Rebecca L Sparks-Thissen, Scott Kreher, Samuel H Speck, Herbert W Virgin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Memory T cell-mediated rejection is mitigated by FcγRIIB expression on CD8American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pathogen Stimulation History Impacts Donor-Specific CD8(+) T Cell Susceptibility to Costimulation/Integrin Blockade-Based Therapy.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas C BraatenDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, Box 8118, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Rebecca L Sparks-Thissen
Scott Kreher
Samuel H Speck
Herbert W Virgin
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Infectious Diseases/Basic Microbial Pathogenic MechanismsT32AI007172 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel E. Goldberg, JENNIFER A PHILIPS · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
TRAINING IN THE IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY OF CANCERT32CA009547 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT DAVID SCHREIBER · 1986 to 2026
$12.1M
Regulation of Y-herpesvirus latency and tumorigenesisR01CA074730 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VIRGIN, HERBERT W · 1998 to 2007
$2.8M
T Cell Vaccination Against gamma-herpesvirus LatencyR01CA096511 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VIRGIN, HERBERT W · 2002 to 2012
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS 5-T32-CA09547NCI NIH HHS CA96511NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074730NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096511NCI NIH HHS R01CA74730NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009547NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007172PHS HHS R0160090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies to prime CD8(+) T cells against Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (gammaHV68; MHV68) latency have, to date, resulted in only limited effects. While early forms of latency (<21 days) were significantly reduced, effects were not seen at later times, indicating loss of control by the primed CD8(+) T cells. In the present study, we evaluated CD8(+) T cells in an optimized system, consisting of OTI T-cell-receptor (TCR) transgenic mice, which generate clonal CD8(+) T cells specific for K(b)-SIINFEKL of OVA, and a recombinant gammaHV68 that expresses OVA (gammaHV68.OVA). Our aim was to test whether this optimized system would result in more effective control not only of acute infection but also of later forms of latent infection than was seen with previous strategies. First, we show that OTI CD8(+) T cells effectively controlled acute replication of gammaHV68.OVA in liver, lung, and spleen at 8 and 16 days after infection of OTI/RAG mice, which lack expression of B and CD4(+) T cells. However, we found that, despite eliminating detectable acute replication, the OTI CD8(+) T cells did not prevent the establishment of latency in the OTI/RAG mice. We next evaluated the effectiveness of OTI T cells in OTI/B6 animals, which express B cells--a major site of latency in wild-type mice--and CD4(+) T cells. In OTI/B6 mice OTI CD8(+) T cells not only reduced the frequency of cells that reactivate from latency and the frequency of cells bearing the viral genome at 16 days after infection (similar to what has been reported before) but also were effective at reducing latency at 42 days after infection. Together, these data show that CD8(+) T cells are sufficient, in the absence of B cells and CD4(+) T cells, for effective control of acute replication. The data also demonstrate for the first time that a strong CD8(+) T-cell response can limit long-term latent infection.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte ActivationAnimalsB-LymphocytesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesGammaherpesvirinaeHerpesviridae InfectionsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutOvalbuminVirus LatencyOvalbumin

Identifiers

PMID15681457
PMCPMC546552
OpenAlexW2128048082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.