ArticleJournal of virology2005
Involvement of the interferon-regulated antiviral proteins PKR and RNase L in reovirus-induced shutoff of cellular translation.
Article in Journal of virology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Effective Vaccines Against Piscine Orthoreovirus: Challenges and Current Strategies.Viruses · 2025Review
- A CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening identifies IRF2 as a key driver of OAS3/RNase L-mediated RNA decay during viral infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Reovirus μ2 Protein Impairs Translation to Reduce U5 snRNP Protein Levels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The multi-functional reovirus σ3 protein is a virulence factor that suppresses stress granule formation and is associated with myocardial injury.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Roadblocks and fast tracks: How RNA binding proteins affect the viral RNA journey in the cell.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021Review
- A Single Point Mutation, AsnViruses · 2021Article
- Review
- Lymphatic Type 1 Interferon Responses Are Critical for Control of Systemic Reovirus Dissemination.Journal of virology · 2021Article
- Reovirus and the Host Integrated Stress Response: On the Frontlines of the Battle to Survive.Viruses · 2021Review
- Inhibition of PKR by Viruses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Orchestrated efforts on host network hijacking: Processes governing virus replication.Virulence · 2020Review
- Past, Present and Future of Oncolytic Reovirus.Cancers · 2020Review
- The PERK Inhibitor GSK2606414 Enhances Reovirus Infection in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma via an ATF4-Dependent Mechanism.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2020Article
- Dissemination ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Polymorphisms in the Most Oncolytic Reovirus Strain Confer Enhanced Cell Attachment, Transcription, and Single-Step Replication Kinetics.Journal of virology · 2020Article
- Erythroid Progenitor Cells in Atlantic Salmon (Viruses · 2019Article
- Zika Virus Production Is Resistant to RNase L Antiviral Activity.Journal of virology · 2019Article
- How Many Mammalian Reovirus Proteins are involved in the Control of the Interferon Response?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular translation is inhibited following infection with most strains of reovirus, but the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain to be elucidated. The extent of host shutoff varies in a strain-dependent manner; infection with the majority of strains leads to strong host shutoff, while infection with strain Dearing results in minimal inhibition of cellular translation. A genetic study with reassortant viruses and subsequent biochemical analyses led to the hypothesis that the interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase, PKR, is responsible for reovirus-induced host shutoff. To directly determine whether PKR is responsible for reovirus-induced host shutoff, we used a panel of reovirus strains and mouse embryo fibroblasts derived from knockout mice. This approach revealed that PKR contributes to but is not wholly responsible for reovirus-induced host shutoff. Studies with cells lacking RNase L, the endoribonuclease component of the interferon-regulated 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthetase-RNase L system, demonstrated that RNase L also down-regulates cellular protein synthesis in reovirus-infected cells. In many viral systems, PKR and RNase L have well-characterized antiviral functions. An analysis of reovirus replication in cells lacking these molecules indicated that, while they contributed to host shutoff, neither PKR nor RNase L exerted an antiviral effect on reovirus growth. In fact, some strains of reovirus replicated more efficiently in the presence of PKR and RNase L than in their absence. Data presented in this report illustrate that the inhibition of cellular translation following reovirus infection is complex and involves multiple interferon-regulated gene products. In addition, our results suggest that reovirus has evolved effective mechanisms to avoid the actions of the interferon-stimulated antiviral pathways that include PKR and RNase L and may even benefit from their expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.