Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15679510›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2005

Recruitment of families for genetic studies of epilepsy.

Ruth Ottman, Karina Berenson, Christie Barker-Cummings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruth OttmanG.H. Sergievsky Center and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA. ro6@columbia.edu
Karina Berenson
Christie Barker-Cummings

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of Seizure Disorders In RochesterR01NS043472 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI OTTMAN, RUTH · 2002 to 2006
$6.2M
GENETICS OF AD PARTIAL EPILEPSY WITH AUDITORY FEATURESR01NS036319 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI OTTMAN, RUTH · 1997 to 2007
$3.7M
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF FAMILIAL EPILEPSYR01NS020656 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI OTTMAN, RUTH · 1985 to 2001
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020656NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036319NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043472NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS20656NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS36319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudy of families containing multiple affected individuals is essential for genetic research on the epilepsies, yet practically nothing has been published about methods for identification and recruitment of families or expected participation rates. Here we describe the strategy used for data collection in a genetic linkage study, to provide guidelines for efficient design of new studies.

methodsPotentially eligible families were ascertained from private physicians, clinics, and self-referrals. Participation rates were examined at each step of the recruitment process, according to ascertainment source, initial contact method, gender, and ethnicity.

resultsAmong 320 potentially eligible families identified, only 68 (21%) were successfully enrolled. Contact was established with an index subject in 83% of families, and a screen for eligibility was completed in 88% of these. However, only 54% of screened families were confirmed to be eligible, and of these, only 54% were enrolled. In eligible families, 79% of index subjects agreed to participate; the low family enrollment rates resulted largely from refusals by other family members whose participation was needed for linkage analysis. At each step in the recruitment process, the participation rate was higher in self-referred than in other families.

conclusionsRecruitment of families for genetic studies is labor-intensive; many potentially eligible families may have to be screened for each family enrolled. Recruitment is easier with self-referred families than with those identified through other methods. The introduction of standardized methods for identification of eligible families from clinical settings can improve efficiency.

Indexed as

FamilyAdultAge of OnsetData CollectionEligibility DeterminationEpilepsyFemaleGenetic LinkageGuidelines as TopicHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SelectionRefusal to ParticipateResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID15679510
PMCPMC1352333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.