ArticleEpilepsia2005
Recruitment of families for genetic studies of epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Reproductive decision-making in families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2021Article
- Genetic attribution and perceived impact of epilepsy in multiplex epilepsy families.Epilepsia · 2019Article
- Mood disorders in familial epilepsy: A test of shared etiology.Epilepsia · 2018Article
- Depression and genetic causal attribution of epilepsy in multiplex epilepsy families.Epilepsia · 2016Article
- Parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in multiplex epilepsy families.Epilepsia · 2016Article
- Article
- A statistical approach for rare-variant association testing in affected sibships.American journal of human genetics · 2015Article
- Genetic testing preferences in families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2014Article
- Epi4K: gene discovery in 4,000 genomes.Epilepsia · 2012Article
- Recruitment for genetic studies of epilepsy.Epilepsy research · 2012Article
- Evaluation of depression risk in LGI1 mutation carriers.Epilepsia · 2010Article
- Enhancing recruitment of African-American families into genetic research: lessons learned from Project SuGar.Journal of community genetics · 2010Article
- Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature.American journal of public health · 2006Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeStudy of families containing multiple affected individuals is essential for genetic research on the epilepsies, yet practically nothing has been published about methods for identification and recruitment of families or expected participation rates. Here we describe the strategy used for data collection in a genetic linkage study, to provide guidelines for efficient design of new studies.
methodsPotentially eligible families were ascertained from private physicians, clinics, and self-referrals. Participation rates were examined at each step of the recruitment process, according to ascertainment source, initial contact method, gender, and ethnicity.
resultsAmong 320 potentially eligible families identified, only 68 (21%) were successfully enrolled. Contact was established with an index subject in 83% of families, and a screen for eligibility was completed in 88% of these. However, only 54% of screened families were confirmed to be eligible, and of these, only 54% were enrolled. In eligible families, 79% of index subjects agreed to participate; the low family enrollment rates resulted largely from refusals by other family members whose participation was needed for linkage analysis. At each step in the recruitment process, the participation rate was higher in self-referred than in other families.
conclusionsRecruitment of families for genetic studies is labor-intensive; many potentially eligible families may have to be screened for each family enrolled. Recruitment is easier with self-referred families than with those identified through other methods. The introduction of standardized methods for identification of eligible families from clinical settings can improve efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.